Real World Survival Outcomes in Patients with High Risk Stage II Colon Cancer at a Beijing Cancer Hospital.

Aiwen Wu,Peng-ju Chen,Tian-le Li,Irene Dankwa-Mullan,Ting-Ting Sun,Kyu Rhee
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.e15670
IF: 45.3
2018-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:e15670 Background: Overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) advantage conferred on patients with stage II colon cancer remains unproven and controversial. In addition, optimal adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for stage II disease remains debatable. The FOLFOX regimen was superior to short-term FU/LV in the MOSAIC trial, however, OS and DFS benefit was limited to stage III disease. An investigative analysis showed an absolute difference in 5-year DFS that favored FOLFOX in stage II patients with high-risk tumors, but it was not statistically significant. The SEER study showed no difference in median 5-years OS between patients in chemotherapy group and the surveillance group (56.1% vs 56.7%). The promise of precision medicine and cognitive technology tools such as IBM Watson for Oncology (WFO) may be beneficial for facilitating personalized treatment choices based on evidence and survival outcomes. Methods: This study leveraged WFO for treatment evidence comparison. We measured survival outcomes and prognostic factors for 229 patients with Stage II colon who received resection between 2006-2015. Five-year OS and DFS was examined using the Kaplan Meier survival analysis, and comparison of OS and DFS curve was performed by log rank test. Results: The 3-year OS, 5-year OS, 3-year DFS and 5-year DFS, were 92.1, 88.5, 87.2, and 83.0%, respectively. Patients that received chemotherapy had significantly higher 5-year OS than those received surveillance (94.9% vs 84.1%, p = 0.03). OS and DFS was significantly shorter in patients with 2 or more risk factors (log rank test, p = 0.01 and 0.02 respectively). Conclusions: Study showed overall superior OS and DFS compared to patients in real world studies including trials in WFO curated literature. Limitations of this study included use of retrospective cases, inadequate number of cases with 2 or more prognostic factors and uneven clinicopathological features for the analysis. Performance status and co-morbidities were not assessed, which may influence survival outcomes. Nonetheless this study was important for assessing survival outcomes in Chinese patients with Stage II colon cancer. This suggests need for further clinical trials targeting this group.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?