Metastasis Risk Prediction in Non-Translocation Soft Tissue Sarcoma with A Novel Gene Expression Profile Assay.

Sujana Mowa,Weiwei Shan,Margaret von Mehren,Jeffrey M. Farma,Natalie Lassen,Clare Johnson,Derek Maetzold,Robert W. Cook
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.11055
IF: 45.3
2016-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:11055 Background: Accurate prognostication for non-translocation soft tissue sarcoma (NT-STS) with a complex karyotype remains a clinical obstacle. We previously reported the development of a gene expression profiling assay, the STS-profile, for metastasis risk prediction in NT-STS. In a cohort of 77 primary NT-STS patients, STS-profile-stratified Class 1 (low risk) and Class 2 (high risk) tumors had 5-year metastasis-free survival (MFS) of 79% and 12%, respectively (p<0.0001); results that outperform current staging factors. This study evaluated the impact of tumor heterogeneity on the STS-profile, and assessed its accuracy in two independent cohorts of NT-STS from the external sample set used to discover CINSARC, a 67-probe metastasis risk predictor for NT-STS. Methods: For the heterogeneity study, 14 primary STS cases with multiple FFPE tissue blocks were collected according to an Institutional Review Board approved protocol. RNA was extracted from tissue sections and RT-PCR for the genes in the profile was performed. Class prediction was determined by Partial Least Squares (PLS) predictive modeling for the heterogeneity and independent performance studies. Results: Twelve of 14 (86%) cases exhibited concordant class predictions in the heterogeneity study. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the STS-profile was a more significant predictor of MFS than CINSARC in both cohorts (Cohort 1 STS-profile HR=4.56, p<0.0001 vs CINSARC HR 3.44, p=0.0005; Cohort 2 STS-profile HR=3.31, p=0.0006 vs CINSARC HR=1.89, p=0.20). The STS-profile also generated higher positive predictive values (PPV) when compared to CINSARC in both cohorts (Table 1). Conclusions: Our results suggest minimal impact of molecular heterogeneity on the accuracy of the STS-profile in predicting metastasis risk. Assessed in two independent cohorts of NT-STS within the CINSARC dataset, the STS-profile assay was able to distinguish two groups with significantly different metastatic risk. Cohort 1, n=138 Cohort 2, n=109 N 5-yr MFS (# events) PPV N 5-yr MFS (# events) PPV Class 1 78 75% (17) 78% 73 76% (14) 75% Class 2 60 19% (47) 36 30% (27) CINSARC low risk 55 81% (10) 65% 28 80% (5) 44% CINSARC high risk 83 31% (54) 81 48% (36)
What problem does this paper attempt to address?