Combination of Biomarker and Clinicopathologic Characters to Circle out Beneficiaries Through Second-Line Immunotherapy: A Meta Analyse.

C. Zhang,Wenzhao Zhong,Zhong Yi Dong,Yi-Long Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2017.09.308
IF: 45.3
2017-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:e14535 Background: Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression had been proposed as predictive biomarker to immune-checkpoint inhibitors. Yet treatment responses are not always consistent with this single agent in the second-line therapy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Whether combination of PD-L1 and clinicopathologic characters could circle out optimal beneficiaries are still unknown. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of randomized control trials that compared immune-checkpoint inhibitors against chemotherapy in second-line therapy. Data including smoking status, EGFR status, KRAS status and histology were extracted as subgroup analyse to estimate the potential predictor of efficacy for anti PD-1/L1. Results: Five clinical trials that compared immune-checkpoint inhibitors against chemotherapy for second-line therapy were included. Both PD-L1 positive (HR = 0.64, 95%CI = 0.56-0.73, P < 0.00001) and PD-L1 negative (HR = 0.88, 95%CI = 0.78-1.00, P = 0.05) favored anti PD-1/L1. Subgroup analyse indicated that adenocarcinoma (ADC) as well as squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) preferred anti PD-1/L1. Never smokers may not benefit from anti PD-1/L1 but current/ever smokers did (HR = 0.70, 95%CI = 0.63-0.79, P < 0.00001). Patients with EGFR mutation could not gain benefit from anti PD-1/L1 while the EGFR wild type could (HR = 0.67, 95%CI = 0.60-0.76, P < 0.00001). Both KRAS mutation (HR = 0.60, 95%CI = 0.39-0.92, P = 0.02) and wild type/unknown (HR = 0.81, 95%CI = 0.67-0.97, P = 0.02) were apt to anti PD-1/L1. Conclusions: Regardless of PD-L1 status, immune-checkpoint inhibitors could achieve better efficacy than chemotherapy in second-line therapy. Current/ever smokers without EGFR mutations may benefit more from anti PD-1/L1. Combination of PD-L1 and strongly relevant clinicopathologic characters should be considered to tailor optimal patients for anti PD-1/L1.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?