Towards Understanding Human Embryo Mosaicism: Regional and Developmental Genetic Concordance by Single Cell Sequencing

G. D. Smith,L. Yan,Y. Ren,L. Keller,Z. Yan,J. Qiao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.07.316
IF: 6.7
2018-01-01
Fertility and Sterility
Abstract:Knowledge of human preimplantation embryonic genetic concordance at a single cell level is essential, and significantly wanting, to fully appreciate the incidence of human embryo mosaicism and interpretation of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in relation and offspring genetic normalcy. We asked the question: how does the ploidy status compare between neighboring trophectoderm (TE) cells, neighboring inner cell mass (ICM) cells, and ICM-derived human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) at a single cell level? Prospective single cell genetic analysis and comparison of human embryo TE, ICM, and resulting hESCs. Human blastocysts no longer needed for reproduction or unsuitable for implantation were donated with informed consent to an IRB-approved study for hESC derivation. Warmed blastocysts underwent laser dissection of the ICM for hESC derivation and resulting TE was collected for single cell isolation. ICMs were plated on human foreskin fibroblasts in xeno-free media with knock-out serum replacement at 5%O2/5%CO2/90%N2; 37°C. After 3-4 days of culture half of the ICM was harvested for single cell isolation. Remaining ICMs were used to derive hESCs. TE, ICM, and hESC single cells were isolated with trypsin/accutase treatment, confirmed to be single cells, placed individually into tubes for lysis, and whole genome DNA amplification was performed by multiple annealing and looping based amplification cycles. Single cell amplicons were confirmed by gel electrophoresis, used to make sequencing libraries, and subjected to next generation sequencing to compute copy number variance (CNV) for single cell aneuploidy detection. hESCs were also assessed by single cell G-banding. Differences in genetic concordance (%) within specific embryonic regions and/or during development of hESCs were statistically compared by X2 with p-values ≤ 0.05 considered significant. To date 252 single cell CNVs have been measured, comprised of 182 single cell-TEs from 19 embryos (9.6±0.8, ave±se cells/embryo), 37 single cell-ICMs from 3 embryos (12.3±3.3 cells/embryo), and 33 single cell-hESCs from 3 embryos (11.0±2.3 cells/embryo). Collectively, significantly less single cell genetic concordance (p<0.001) existed in TE (69%) compared to ICM (89%) and hESCs (94%). In the only 2 sample sets with TEs, ICMs, and hESCs per embryo, the per embryo/per region concordance rates were TE - (50%, n=10 and 50%, n=10), ICM - (95%, n=19 and 89%, n=9), and hESCs (100%, n=11 and 100%, n=12), respectively. These data suggest that single cell genetic concordance is lower in the human TE compared to the ICM and/or resulting hESCs. These findings may have significant relevance on understanding: i) human embryo mosaicism, ii) PGT-A results obtained from multiple unknown numbers of TE cells biopsied, and iii) fidelity of TE proxy for the ICM and subsequent offspring genetic normalcy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?