Abstract:We use high-frequency spot prices from the Australian New South Wales (NSW) electricity market to calculate the non-parametric realized volatility as well as identify price jumps. We show that the residuals of the heterogeneous autoregressive (HAR) models of realized volatility still exhibit volatility clustering. Therefore, we extend the HAR models by characterizing such time-varying volatility of realized volatility through three GARCH-type models: the GARCH model, the long-memory FIGARCH model, and the asymmetric EGARCH model. Furthermore, we augment the above HAR-GARCH-type models to capture the inverse leverage effect and to exploit the errors in realized volatility estimators. The resulting models are referred to as the HARQ-L-GARCH-type models. They each have better in-sample fit than the corresponding HAR-GARCH-type models, whose in-sample fit are much better than the benchmark HAR models. More importantly, Diebold-Mariano tests on out-of-sample forecasts reinforce our extensions, as the forecast accuracy of the HAR-GARCH-type models significantly outperforms that of the benchmark HAR models under six conventional criteria, and the forecast accuracy of the HARQ-L-GARCH-type models is even higher. Finally, the model confidence set tests indicate that, 1) modeling the residual variance with the GARCH structure and the FIGARCH structure can more effectively improve the out-of-sample forecasting performance of the HAR models. 2) Incorporating jumps in the HAR structure improves the out-of-sample forecasting performance. 3) The HARQ-L-CJ-GARCH model is superior for predicting volatility in the NSW electricity market.

Forecasting oil futures price volatility: New evidence from realized range-based volatility

Prediction of Volatility Based on Realized-Garch-kernel-type Models: Evidence from China and the U.S.

To jump or not to jump: momentum of jumps in crude oil price volatility prediction

Financial Volatility Forecasting with Range-Based Autoregressive Volatility Model

Crude oil volatility index forecasting: New evidence based on positive and negative jumps from Chinese stock market

Forecasting the realized range-based volatility using dynamic model averaging approach

Hybrid forecasting of crude oil volatility index: The cross‐market effects of stock market jumps

The role of oil futures intraday information on predicting US stock market volatility

Forecasting the volatility of crude oil futures: The role of oil investor attention and its regime switching characteristics under a high-frequency framework

Volatility of Volatility and VIX Forecasting: New Evidence Based on Jumps, the Short‐Term and Long‐Term Volatility

Measuring and Forecasting Stock Market Volatilities with High-Frequency Data

Modeling the Volatility of Realized Volatility to Improve Volatility Forecasts in Electricity Markets

Oil volatility risk and stock market volatility predictability: Evidence from G7 countries

Separating Big Jumps and Small Jumps:Does It Help Volatility Forecasting?

Volatility predictability in crude oil futures: Evidence based on OVX, GARCH and stochastic volatility models

Forecasting Crude Oil Price Intervals and Return Volatility Via Autoregressive Conditional Interval Models

Using implied volatility jumps for realized volatility forecasting: Evidence from the Chinese market

The Economic Value of Volatility Timing with Realized Jumps

Revisiting the Puzzle of Jumps in Volatility Forecasting: the New Insights of High‐frequency Jump Intensity

A new high-frequency volatility forecasting model for crude oil market—evidence from RGARCH-CARR-MIDAS model

Explore jump behaviour in China's crude oil future market during the COVID-19