Abstract:Backgrounds Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy targeting CD19 has demonstrated 80-90% complete remission (CR) rate in R/R B-ALL; however, 10% to 20% of patients have no response and the potential etiology and risk factors remain unclear. Patients and Methods From Apr. 2017 to Mar. 2019, 254 patients with R/R B-ALL received treatment at our single center with a second-generation CD 19 CAR-T from 5 companies (NCT03173417; ChiCTR-ONC-17012829; NCT02546739; ChiCTR1800016541; and NCT03671460). The targeted median infused CAR-T cell dose was 3x105/kg. For all patients, screening was undertaken for 58 types of B-ALL related gene mutations and 49 congenital immune deficiency gene mutations using next generation sequencing (NGS) method. The patient and CAR-T product characteristics were analyzed to see if any factors affected the initial CR rate. Univariate analysis comparing CR rates between subgroups were carried out using chi-squared tests. Logistic regression model was adopted for multivariate analysis. Results On D30, 90.6% (230/254) patients achieved CR, and minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative CR was 89.4% (227/254). Univariate analysis (Table 1&2) showed a statistical difference in CR rate between females and males (84.54% vs. 94.27%, p=0.011). The CR rate of patients who received prior either CAR-T or blinatumomab treatment was lower than those who had not (50% vs. 91.53%, p=0.01). For the characteristic fusion genes, the CR rate in patients with MLL-AF4 was 80%, which was inferior to those with other or no fusion genes (P=0.041). For gene mutations, a lower CR rate was observed in patients with TP53 mutation compared to those with other or no mutations (72.73% vs. 92.11% vs. 94.39%, P=0.004). Presence of congenital immune deficiency gene mutations did not affect CR rate. Patients with >20% bone marrow (BM) blasts had a worse outcome than those with BM blasts≤20% (79.17% vs. 97.47%, p<0.001). There were no differences in CR between patients age 1-14 yr and >14 yr, patients with or without extramedullary disease (EMD), or patients receiving different chemotherapies between enrollment and CAR-T cells infusion on top of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (FC) conditioning regimen. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity had no effect on CR rate.There was a trend towards a lower CR rate in patients who received donor-derived CAR-T versus patient-derived CAR-T products (61.54% vs. 92.12%, p = 0.081). A lower CR rate was observed in patients who received CD28 costimulatory domain versus 4-1BB CAR-T products (77.27% vs. 91.70%, p=0.053). There was no difference in CR rate between patients infused with cell dose ≥3x105/kg vs. cell dose <3x105/kg and >2x104/kg. No CR difference was observed from different manufacturing companies. Moreover, 125/254 cases had available data for analysis on subsets of CAR-T cells including central memory T cells (Tcm), naive T cells and T memory stem cells (Tscm). Each group was divided into high- or low-level groups based on the median level. The CR rate was 92.19% vs. 88.52% in high and low Tcm groups, 92.31% vs. 88.33% in high or low naive group, and 89.80% vs.90.24% in high and low Tscm groups, respectively. No difference in CR between the groups were observed. Multivariate analysis was performed to investigate factors affecting achievement of CR (Table 3). Female group had lower odds of achieving CR after CAR-T therapy compared to male group [OR=0.232(95%CI 0.082-0.652)]. Compared to patients without TP53 mutation or only with other gene mutations, patients with TP53 mutation were more likely to have a low CR rate after CAR-T treatment [OR=4.511(95%CI 1.295-16.895)]. Patients with BM blast >20% had lower odds of achieving CR compared to those with BM blast ≤20% [OR=0.095 (95%CI 0.022-0.260)]. Treatment with CAR-T with CD28 as a costimulatory domain resulted lower odds of CR compared to treatment with CAR-T with 4-1BB [OR=7.141 (95%CI 1.722-29.612)]. Patients who developed severe neurotoxicity (grade 2-4) post CAR-T had higher odds of achieving CR compared to patients with grade 0-1 neurotoxicity [OR=34.796(95%CI 3.232-374.659)]. Conclusions In this analysis, we have observed that significant risk factors for not achieving CR after CD-19 CAR-T therapy include female gender, BM blasts more than 20%, a positive TP53 mutation, treatment with CD28 co-stimulatory domain vs 4-1BB CAR-T product, and mild as opposed to severe CAR-T related neurotoxicity. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Which Is Better In Cd19 Car-T Treatment Of R/R B-All, Cd28 Or 4-1bb? A Parallel Trial Under The Same Manufacturing Process.

Efficacy and Safety of CD28- or 4-1BB-Based CD19 CAR-T Cells in B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Parallel Comparison of 4-1BB or CD28 Co-stimulated CD19-Targeted CAR-T Cells for B Cell Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma

Which one is better for refractory/relapsed acute B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia: Single-target (CD19) or dual-target (tandem or sequential CD19/CD22) CAR T-cell therapy?

Combination of Anti-CD19 and Anti-CD20 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells for Relapsed and Refractory Diffuse Larger B Cell Lymphoma: an Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase Ⅰ/Ⅱ Trial

Sustained Remission and Decreased Severity of CAR T-Cell Related Adverse Events: A Pivotal Study Report of CNCT19 (inaticabtagene Autoleucel) Treatment in Adult Patients with Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (R/R B-Cell ALL) in China

Cd19 Targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor T (Car-T) Cell Immunotherapy Has Demonstrated Significant Anti-Leukemia Activity In Pediatric Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Multicentre Study In China.

Tandem CD19/CD22 Dual Targets CAR-T Cells Therapy Obtains Superior CR Rate Than Single CD19 CAR-T Cells Infusion As Well As Sequential CD19 and CD22 CAR-T Cells Infusion for Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients

Analysis Of Factors Predicting Treatment Response Of 254 Patients Who Received Cd19-Targeted Car-T Cell Therapy For Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-All)

A Durable 4-1Bb-based CD19 CAR-T Cell for Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Tandem CD19/CD22 Dual Targets CAR-T Cells Therapy Acquires Superior CR Rate Than CD19 CAR-T Cells: A Case Controlled Study

CD19-Specific CAR-T Cell Treatment of 115 Children and Young Adults with Acute B Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Long-term Follow-up.

Phase 1 Results of CNCT19: CD19 CAR Constructed of a New Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor in Relapsed or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

A comparison of chimeric antigen receptors containing CD28 versus 4-1BB costimulatory domains

Efficacy and safety of CD19 CAR T constructed with a new anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor in relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia

[Safety and Efficacy of CD19-targeted CAR-T Cells in 14 Patients with Refractory/relapsed Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute B-precursor Lymphoblastic Leukemia].

Efficacy and Safety of Innovative Experimental Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cells versus Axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta) for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma (LBCL): Matching Adjusted Indirect Comparisons (MAICs) and Systematic Review

In Vivo Expansion and Antitumor Activity of Coinfused CD28- and 4-1BB-Engineered CAR-T Cells in Patients with B Cell Leukemia.

Clinical Study on the CD19-Targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy for Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblast Leukemia: A Single Center of Real World Data

Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cells With 4-1bb Co-Stimulatory Domain Present A Superior Treatment Outcome Than Those With Cd28 Domain Based On Bioinformatics

Phase I Trial of Fourth-Generation Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells Against Relapsed or Refractory B Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas