Abstract:Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) is an essential component of legal assistant systems, which aims to automatically predict judgment results from a given criminal fact description. As a vital subtask of LJP, researchers have paid little attention to the numerical LJP, i.e., the prediction of imprisonment and penalty. Existing methods ignore numerical information in the criminal facts, making their performances far from satisfactory. For instance, the amount of theft varies, as do the prison terms and penalties. The major challenge is how the model can obtain the ability of numerical comparison and magnitude perception, e.g., 400 < 500 < 800, 500 is closer to 400 than to 800. To this end, we propose a judicial knowledge-enhanced magnitude-aware reasoning architecture, called NumLJP, for the numerical LJP task. Specifically, we first implement a contrastive learning-based judicial knowledge selector to distinguish confusing criminal cases efficiently. Unlike previous approaches that employ the law article as external knowledge, judicial knowledge is a quantitative guideline in real scenarios. It contains many numerals (called anchors) that can construct a reference frame. Then we design a masked numeral prediction task to help the model remember these anchors to acquire legal numerical commonsense from the selected judicial knowledge. We construct a scale-based numerical graph using the anchors and numerals in facts to perform magnitude-aware numerical reasoning. Finally, the representations of fact description, judicial knowledge, and numerals are fused to make decisions. We conduct extensive experiments on three real-world datasets and select several competitive baselines. The results demonstrate that the macro-F1 of NumLJP improves by at least 9.53% and 11.57% on the prediction of penalty and imprisonment, respectively.

An Empirical Study of Linear Dimensionality Reduction for Judicial Predictive Models

Computational and Theoretical Analysis of Supervised Dimensionality Reduction

A Predictive Performance Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Judicial Cases.

Mixture Conditional Regression with Ultrahigh Dimensional Text Data for Estimating Extralegal Factor Effects

An Empirical Study of Law Articles Prediction on Transportation Legal Cases

Applying Data Discretization to DPCNN for Law Article Prediction

A Variance Minimization Criterion to Feature Selection Using Laplacian Regularization

Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction for Discriminative Analytics of Multiple Datasets

Enabling Discriminative Reasoning in LLMs for Legal Judgment Prediction

Legal Judgment Prediction with Multiple Perspectives on Civil Cases

Ensemble Methods for Word Embedding Model Based on Judicial Text.

A Deep Learning Method for Judicial Decision Support

Supervised Linear Dimension-Reduction Methods: Review, Extensions, and Comparisons

Using Case Facts to Predict Penalty with Deep Learning.

Exploring Dimension Learning Via a Penalized Probabilistic Principal Component Analysis

Knowledge is Power: Understanding Causality Makes Legal judgment Prediction Models More Generalizable and Robust

An Experimental Study of Dimension Reduction Methods on Machine Learning Algorithms with Applications to Psychometrics

Judicial knowledge-enhanced magnitude-aware reasoning for numerical legal judgment prediction

Interpretable linear dimensionality reduction based on bias-variance analysis

Sparse Local Discriminant Projections for Feature Extraction

Sr-LDA:Sparse and Reduced-Rank Linear Discriminant Analysis for High Dimensional Matrix