Abstract:No AccessTechnical NotesOptimal Tolerance Allocation in Blade Manufacturing by Sensitivity-Based Performance Impact EvaluationJiaqi Luo, Yao Zheng and Feng LiuJiaqi LuoZhejiang University, 310027 Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China*Principal Investigator, School of Aeronautics and Astronautics; .Search for more papers by this author, Yao ZhengZhejiang University, 310027 Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China†Professor, School of Aeronautics and Astronautics; .Search for more papers by this author and Feng LiuUniversity of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697-3975‡Professor, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering; . Fellow AIAA.Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:18 May 2020https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B37718SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Bammert K. and Sandstede H., “Influence of Manufacturing Tolerances and Surface Roughness of Blades on the Performance of Turbines,” Journal of Engineering for Power, Vol. 98, No. 1, 1976, pp. 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3446107 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[2] Roelke R. and Haas J., “The Effect of Rotor Blade Thickness and Surface Finish on the Performance of a Small Axial Flow Turbine,” Journal of Engineering for Power, Vol. 105, No. 2, 1983, pp. 377–382. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3227426 Google Scholar[3] Garzon V. and Darmofal D., “Impact of Geometric Variability on Axial Compressor Performance,” Journal of Turbomachinery, Vol. 125, No. 4, 2003, pp. 692–703. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1622715 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[4] Dong Z., Hu W. and Xue D., “New Production Cost-Tolerance Models for Tolerance Synthesis,” Journal of Engineering for Industry, Vol. 116, No. 2, 1994, pp. 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2901931 Google Scholar[5] Edwards R., Asghar A., Woodason R., LaViolette M., Goni Boulama K. and Allan W., “Numerical Investigation of the Influence of Real World Blade Profile Variations on the Aerodynamic Performance of Transonic Nozzle Guide Vanes,” Journal of Turbomachinery, Vol. 134, No. 2, 2012, Paper 021014. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4003050 Google Scholar[6] Lange A., Voigt M., Vogeler K., Schrapp H., Johann E. and Gümmer V., “Impact of Manufacturing Variability on Multistage High-Pressure Compressor Performance,” Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, Vol. 134, No. 11, 2012, Paper 112601. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4007167 Google Scholar[7] Schnell R., Lengyel-Kampmann T. and Nicke E., “On the Impact of Geometric Variability on Fan Aerodynamic Performance, Unsteady Blade Row Interaction, and Its Mechanical Characteristics,” Journal of Turbomachinery, Vol. 136, No. 9, 2014, Paper 091005. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4027218 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[8] Parussini L., Pediroda V. and Poloni C., “Prediction of Geometric Uncertainty Effects on Fluid Dynamics by Polynomial Chaos and Fictitious Domain Method,” Computers and Fluids, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2010, pp. 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2009.07.008 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[9] Dow E. and Wang Q., “The Implications of Tolerance Optimization on Compressor Blade Design,” Journal of Turbomachinery, Vol. 137, No. 10, 2015, Paper 101008. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4030791 Google Scholar[10] Zamboni G., Banks G. and Bather S., “Gradient-Based Adjoint and Design of Experiment CFD Methodologies to Improve the Manufacturability of High Pressure Turbine Blades,” ASME Turbo Expo 2016: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, ASME Paper GT2016-56042, Fairfield, NJ, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2016-56042 Google Scholar[11] Yang J., Xiong J., McBean I., Havakechian S., Liu F. and Luo J., “Performance Impact of Manufacturing Variations for Multistage Steam Turbines,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 33, No. 4, 2017, pp. 1031–1036. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B36022 LinkGoogle Scholar[12] Jameson A., “Aerodynamic Design via Control Theory,” Journal of Scientific Computing, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1988, pp. 233–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061285 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[13] Luo J., Xiong J., McBean I. and Liu F., “Three-Dimensional Aerodynamic Design Optimization of a Turbine Blade by Using an Adjoint Method,” Journal of Turbomachinery, Vol. 133, No. 1, 2011, Paper 011026. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4001166 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[14] Marta A. and Shankaran S., “Assessing Turbomachinery Performance Sensitivity to Boundary Conditions Using Control Theory,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 30, No. 5, 2014, pp. 1281–1294. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B35087 LinkGoogle Scholar[15] Walther B. and Nadarajah S., “Adjoint-Based Constrained Aerodynamic Shape Optimization for Multistage Turbomachines,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 31, No. 5, 2015, pp. 1298–1319. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B35433 LinkGoogle Scholar[16] Aissa M., Maffuli R., Mueller L. and Verstraete T., “Optimisation of a Turbine Inlet Guide Vane by Gradient-Based and Metamodel-Assisted Methods,” International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics, Vol. 33, Nos. 6–7, 2019, pp. 302–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618562.2019.1683168 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[17] Ghate D. and Giles M., “Efficient Hessian Calculation Using Automatic Differentiation,” 25th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, AIAA Paper 2007-4059, 2007. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-4059 LinkGoogle Scholar[18] Rumpfkeil M. and Mavriplis D., “Efficient Hessian Calculations Using Automatic Differentiation and the Adjoint Method with Applications,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 48, No. 10, 2010, pp. 2406–2417. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J050451 LinkGoogle Scholar[19] Papadimitriou D. and Giannakoglou K., “Computation of the Hessian Matrix in Aerodynamic Inverse Design Using Continuous Adjoint Formulations,” Computers and Fluids, Vol. 37, No. 8, 2008, pp. 1029–1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2007.11.001 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[20] Papadimitriou D. and Giannakoglou K., “Direct, Adjoint and Mixed Approaches for the Computation of Hessian in Airfoil Design Problems,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, Vol. 56, No. 10, 2008, pp. 1929–1943. https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0363 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[21] Hicken J. E., “Inexact Hessian-Vector Products in Reduced-Space Differential-Equation Constrained Optimization,” Optimization and Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2014, pp. 575–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-014-9258-6 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[22] Shi-Dong D. and Nadarajah S., “Approximate Hessian for Accelerated Convergence of Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Problems in an Adjoint-Based Framework,” Computers and Fluids, Vol. 168, May 2018, pp. 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.04.019 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[23] Schillings C., Schimidt S. and Schulz V., “Efficient Shape Optimization for Certain and Uncertain Aerodynamic Design,” Computers and Fluids, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2011, pp. 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2010.12.007 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[24] Papadimitriou D. and Papadimitriou C., “Aerodynamic Shape Optimization for Minimum Robust Drag and Lift Reliability Constraint,” Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 55, Aug. 2016, pp. 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2016.05.005 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[25] Luo J. and Liu F., “Performance Impact of Manufacturing Tolerances for a Turbine Blade Using Second Order Sensitivities,” ASME Turbo Expo 2018: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, ASME Paper GT2018-75999, Fairfield, NJ, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2018-75999 Google Scholar[26] Luo J. and Liu F., “Statistical Evaluation of Performance Impact of Manufacturing Variability by an Adjoint Method,” Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 77, June 2018, pp. 471–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.03.030 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[27] Pini M. and Cinnella P., “Hybrid Adjoint-Based Robust Optimization Approach for Fluid-Dynamics Problems,” 54th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, AIAA Paper 2013-1814, 2013. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-1814 Google Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byCompressor geometric uncertainty quantification under conditions from near choke to near stallChinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 36, No. 3Uncertainty analysis of global and local performance impact of inflow and geometric uncertainties using sparse grid-based non-intrusive polynomial chaos15 April 2022 | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, Vol. 236, No. 7A data-driven non-intrusive polynomial chaos for performance impact of high subsonic compressor cascades with stagger angle and profile errorsAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 129Performance dispersion control of a multistage compressor based on precise identification of critical featuresAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 129A gradient-based method assisted by surrogate model for robust optimization of turbomachinery bladesChinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 35, No. 10Stochastic aerodynamic analysis for compressor blades with manufacturing variability based on a mathematical dimensionality reduction method29 December 2021 | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, Vol. 236, No. 10Robust design optimization considering inlet flow angle variations of a turbine cascadeAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 116 What's Popular Volume 36, Number 4July 2020 CrossmarkInformationCopyright © 2020 by Jiaqi Luo, Yao Zheng, and Feng Liu. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the eISSN 1533-3876 to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. TopicsAerodynamic PerformanceAerodynamicsAeronautical EngineeringAeronauticsComputational Fluid DynamicsEquations of Fluid DynamicsFinite Difference MethodFinite Element MethodFlow RegimesFluid DynamicsMonte Carlo MethodNumerical Analysis KeywordsShape FunctionsTurbomachinerySteam TurbinesAerodynamic Shape OptimizationAerodynamic PerformanceEuler EquationsExternal FlowsComputational Fluid DynamicsSingular Value DecompositionFinite Difference MethodAcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 51676003 and 51976183) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (grant no. 2019QNA4058) for supporting the research work.PDF Received26 June 2019Accepted19 April 2020Published online18 May 2020

Abstract:No AccessEngineering NoteFlexible Multibody Model and the Dynamics of the Deployment of Mesh AntennasYun Peng, Zhihua Zhao, Ming Zhou, Jiawei He, Jungang Yang and Yong XiaoYun PengTsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, People's Republic of China, Zhihua ZhaoTsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, People's Republic of China, Ming ZhouTsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, People's Republic of China, Jiawei HeTsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, People's Republic of China, Jungang YangXi'an Space Radio Academic Institution, 710071 Xi'an, People's Republic of China and Yong XiaoXi'an Space Radio Academic Institution, 710071 Xi'an, People's Republic of ChinaPublished Online:3 Mar 2017https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000361SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Hedgepeth J. M., "Accuracy Potentials for Large Space Antenna Reflectors with Passive Structure," Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 19, No. 3, May 1982, pp. 211–217. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/3.62239 JSCRAG 0022-4650 LinkGoogle Scholar[2] Meguro A., "An Ultra-Light Large Antenna Reflector for Communication Satellites," Proceedings of the 54th International Astronautical Congress of the International Astronautical Federation, the International Academy of Astronautics, and the International Inst. of Space Law, International Astronautical Congress Paper IAC-03-I.1.06, Bremen, Germany, Sept. 2003. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.IAC-03-I.1.06 LinkGoogle Scholar[3] Tibert G., "Deployable Tensegrity Structures for Space Applications," Ph.D. Dissertation, Royal Inst. of Technology, Stockholm, 2002. Google Scholar[4] Thomson M. W., Marks G. W. and Hedgepeth J. M., "Light-Weight Reflector for Concentrating Radiation," U.S. Patent 5,680,145, Oct. 1997. Google Scholar[5] Thomson M. W., "The Astromesh Deployable Reflector," Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, Vol. 3, IEEE Publ., Piscataway, NJ, 1999, pp. 1516–1519. Google Scholar[6] Mobrem M., Kuehn S., Spier C. and Slimko E., "Design and Performance of Astromesh Reflector Onboard Soil Moisture Active Passive Spacecraft," Proceedings of the Aerospace Conference, IEEE Publ., Piscataway, NJ, 2012, pp. 1–10. Google Scholar[7] Li T., "Deployment Analysis and Control of Deployable Space Antenna," Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 18, No. 1, April 2012, pp. 42–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2011.04.001 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[8] Lin J. and Fang H. F., "Concept Study of a 35-m Spherical Reflector System for NEXRAD in Space Application," 47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, NewPort, Rhode Island, May 2006. Google Scholar[9] Smith T., Lee B., Semler D. and Chae D., "A Large S-Band Antenna for a Mobile Satellite," Space 2004 Conference and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 2004-6120, Sept. 2004. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2004-6120 LinkGoogle Scholar[10] Géradin M. and Cardona A., Flexible Multibody Dynamics: A Finite Element Approach, Wiley, New York, 2001, Chaps. 5–7. Google Scholar[11] Bauchau O. A., Flexible Multibody Dynamics, Vol. 176, Springer, The Netherlands, 2010, Chaps. 10, 16. Google Scholar[12] Yu L., Zhao Z., Tang J. and Ren G., "Integration of Absolute Nodal Elements into Multibody System," Nonlinear Dynamics, Vol. 62, No. 4, Dec. 2010, pp. 931–943. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-010-9775-6 NODYES 0924-090X CrossrefGoogle Scholar[13] Hong D. and Ren G., "A Modeling of Sliding Joint on One-Dimensional Flexible Medium," Multibody System Dynamics, Vol. 26, No. 1, Jan. 2011, pp. 91–106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-010-9242-7 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[14] Schiehlen W., "Multibody System Dynamics: Roots and Perspectives," Multibody System Dynamics, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1997, pp. 149–188. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009745432698 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[15] Yang C. and Ren G., "Dynamic Simulation of Multifold Deployable Rings," AIAA Journal, Vol. 52, No. 7, July 2014, pp. 1555–1559. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J052187 AIAJAH 0001-1452 LinkGoogle Scholar[16] Simo J. C. and Vu-Quoc L., "A Three-Dimensional Finite-Strain Rod Model. Part 2: Computational Aspects," Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 58, No. 1, 1986, pp. 79–116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(86)90079-4 CMMECC 0045-7825 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[17] Shabana A. A., Dynamics of Multibody Systems, 3rd ed., Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2005, Chap. 3. CrossrefGoogle Scholar[18] Bauchau O. A., Epple A. and Bottasso C. L., "Scaling of Constraints and Augmented Lagrangian Formulations in Multibody Dynamics Simulations," Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2009, pp. 7–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3079826 JCNDDM 1555-1415 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[19] Hairer E. and Wanner G., Solving Ordinary Differential Equations II: Stiff and Differential-Algebraic Problems, 2nd ed., Springer, Berlin, 2010, Chap. 7. Google Scholar[20] Goldstein H., Poole C. P. and Safko J. L., Classical Mechanics, 3rd ed., Pearson Education International, Pearson Addison-Wesley, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2002, pp. 16–21. Google Scholar[21] Bathe K.-J., Finite Element Procedures, Prentice–Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1996, pp. 796–797. Google Scholar[22] Beer F. P., Johnston E. R. and Mazurek D. F., Vector Mechanics for Engineers. Statics, 10th ed., McGraw–Hill, New York, 2013, pp. 449–451. Google Scholar[23] Danielson J. D., "Mobile Boom Cranes and Advanced Input Shaping Control," Ph.D. Dissertation, Georgia Inst. of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 2008. Google Scholar[24] Sabatini M., Gasbarri P. and Palmerini G. B., "Elastic Issues and Vibration Reduction in a Tethered Deorbiting Mission," Advances in Space Research, Vol. 57, No. 9, May 2016, pp. 1951–1964. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.02.010 ASRSDW 0273-1177 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[25] Zhao Z. and Ren G., "A Quaternion-Based Formulation of Euler–Bernoulli Beam Without Singularity," Nonlinear Dynamics, Vol. 67, No. 3, Feb. 2012, pp. 1825–1835. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-011-0109-0 NODYES 0924-090X CrossrefGoogle Scholar[26] Wu J., Zhao Z. and Ren G., "Multibody Analysis of the Force in Deploying Booms," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 36, No. 6, Nov. 2013, pp. 1881–1886. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.60296 JGCODS 0731-5090 LinkGoogle Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byThe Pretension Design of Cable Mesh considering the Large Deformation of Ring TrussInternational Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 2023Driving cable design for a cylindrical deployable mechanism based on depth first searchActa Astronautica, Vol. 202Investigation of compact packing strategy for large rigid-panel deployable antennasMechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 176Recent Advances in Space-Deployable Structures in ChinaEngineering, Vol. 17Deployment Strategy and Dynamic Analysis of Large Ring Truss AntennaInternational Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 2022Deployment modeling for soft cable networks from slack to tensionInternational Journal of Mechanical Sciences, Vol. 221Configurational forces and geometrically exact formulation of sliding beams in non-material domainsComputer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 395Numerical integration algorithms and constraint formulations for an ALE-ANCF cable elementMechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 170Rod-removal technique for flexible-rods in the framework of semi-recursive multibody formulationMechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 169Deployable Structures: Structural Design and Static/Dynamic Analysis27 October 2021 | Journal of Elasticity, Vol. 146, No. 2Nonlinear dynamic analysis of arresting gears using 2D non-material variable-domain corotational elementsMechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 163Embodiment of intra-abdominal pressure in a flexible multibody model of the trunk and the spinal unloading effects during static lifting tasks29 May 2021 | Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, Vol. 20, No. 4Sensitivity analysis of deployable flexible space structures with a large number of design parameters2 August 2021 | Nonlinear Dynamics, Vol. 105, No. 3Iterative refinement algorithm for efficient velocities and accelerations solutions in closed-loop multibody dynamicsMechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 152Dynamics Modelling and Simulation for Deployment Characteristics of Mesh Reflector Antennas6 November 2020 | Applied Sciences, Vol. 10, No. 21An efficient multibody dynamic model of arresting cable systems based on ALE formulationMechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 151Modeling muscle wrapping and mass flow using a mass-variable multibody formulation20 March 2020 | Multibody System Dynamics, Vol. 49, No. 3A mass-flowing muscle model with shape restrictive soft tissues: correlation with sonoelastography18 December 2019 | Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, Vol. 19, No. 3Trade study to select best alternative for cable and pulley simulation for cranes on offshore vessels2 August 2019 | Systems Engineering, Vol. 23, No. 2Equivalence of Lagrange's equations for non-material volume and the principle of virtual work in ALE formulation17 December 2019 | Acta Mechanica, Vol. 231, No. 3Gravity compensation system of mesh antennas for in-orbit prediction of deployment dynamicsActa Astronautica, Vol. 167An efficient multibody dynamic model of three-dimensional meshing contacts in helical gear-shaft system and its solutionMechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 142Thermal-structural dynamic analysis of a satellite antenna with the cable-network and hoop-truss supports20 August 2019 | Journal of Thermal Stresses, Vol. 42, No. 11Efficient and high-fidelity steering ability prediction of a slender drilling assembly10 August 2019 | Acta Mechanica, Vol. 230, No. 11Dynamic Analysis of the Deployment for Mesh Reflector Antennas Driven With Variable Length Cables23 September 2019 | Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics, Vol. 14, No. 11Harnessing noncircular gears to achieve nonlinear passive springsMechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 140A Multibody Dynamics Approach to Limit Cycle Walking10 April 2019 | Robotica, Vol. 37, No. 10From multiscale modeling to design of synchronization mechanisms in mesh antennasActa Astronautica, Vol. 159Improved vibration attenuation performance of large hoop truss structures via a hybrid control algorithm3 May 2019 | Smart Materials and Structures, Vol. 28, No. 6Torsional negative stiffness mechanism by thin stripsTheoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters, Vol. 9, No. 3Modeling and analysis of sliding joints with clearances in flexible multibody systems4 August 2018 | Nonlinear Dynamics, Vol. 94, No. 4Passive nonlinear actuators for deploying mesh antennasActa Astronautica, Vol. 152Simultaneous topology and size optimization of a 3D variable-length structure described by the ALE–ANCFMechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 129An Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian formulation of a geometrically exact Timoshenko beam running through a tube3 May 2018 | Acta Mechanica, Vol. 229, No. 8A model order reduction method for the simulation of gear contacts based on Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian formulationComputer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 338Buckling of a slender rod confined in a circular tube: Theory, simulation, and experimentInternational Journal of Mechanical Sciences, Vol. 140 What's Popular Volume 40, Number 6June 2017Supplemental Materials CrossmarkInformationCopyright © 2016 by the authors. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the ISSN 0731-5090 (print) or 1533-3884 (online) to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. TopicsAntennasCommunication SystemCommunication Technology and EquipmentComputational Fluid DynamicsComputing, Information, and CommunicationFinite Element MethodFlexible and Active StructuresFluid DynamicsMultibody SimulationNumerical AnalysisNumerical InterpolationStructural AnalysisStructural EngineeringStructural Modeling and SimulationStructures, Design and TestTrusses KeywordsAntenna DesignTrussesBending MomentArbitrary Lagrangian EulerianLongeronsMass FlowMultibody SimulationLagrange MultipliersLinear InterpolationFriction CoefficientAcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank Gexue Ren for several helpful discussions as well as the anonymous reviewers and the Associate Editor Jurek Sasiadek for their constructive and detailed comments on improving this Note. This research was conducted with financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11302114) and the Major State Basic Research Development Program (2012CB821203); their support is highly appreciated.PDF Received18 December 2015Accepted10 November 2016Published online3 March 2017

Modified Semi-Analytical Sensitivity Analysis Method and Its Application to Stiffened Structures

A Ductility-Centred Analytical Model for Axially Restrained Double-Span Steel Beam Systems Subjected to Sudden Columns Loss

Sensitivity analysis on responses of adaptive cable-strut tensile structure with length changeable elements

Dynamic Sensitivity Analysis of Complex Structure Based on FEM

Modified Fourier-Galerkin Solution For Aerospace Skin-Stiffener Panels Subjected To Interface Force And Mixed Boundary Conditions

Inelastic Storey-Buckling Factor of Steel Frames

Analytical and Semi-Analytical Methods for the Evaluation of Dynamic Thermo-Elastic Behavior of Structures Resting on a Pasternak Foundation

Sensitivity analysis of deployable flexible space structures with a large number of design parameters

Automatic structural optimization design using sensitivity-based method

Dynamic Simulation of Multifold Deployable Rings

Optimal Tolerance Allocation in Blade Manufacturing by Sensitivity-Based Performance Impact Evaluation

Finite element design sensitivity analysis and its integration with numerical optimization techniques for structural design

Buckling Design Optimization of Complex Built-Up Structures with Shape and Size Variables

Linear statics and free vibration sensitivity analysis of the composite sandwich plates based on a layerwise/solid-element method

Flexible Multibody Model and the Dynamics of the Deployment of Mesh Antennas

Finite Strain Topology Optimization with Nonlinear Stability Constraints

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS AND REANALYSIS OF GEOMETRICALLY NONLINEAR STRUCTURAL RESPONSE

Finite Element-Based Structural Optimization of Large System Models Under Buckling Constraints

Benchmark Solution of Laminated Beams with Bonding Imperfections

Quasi-Static Shape Control of Flexible Space Structures by Using Heaters

Experimental Verification of the Thermal Flutter Criterion for a Slender Cantilever Boom