Comparative Effectiveness of Non-cisplatin First-line Therapies for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: Phase 2 IMvigor210 Study Versus US Patients Treated in the Veterans Health Administration.

Nancy Vander Velde,Annie Guerin,Raluca Ionescu-Ittu,Sherry Shi,Eric Q. Wu,Shih-Wen Lin,Ling- Hsu,Kai-Uwe Saum,Sabine de Ducla,Jingjing Wang,Shi Li,AnnChristine Thastrom,Shuqian Liu,Lizheng Shi,John T. Leppert

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2018.07.003

IF: 8.208

2018-01-01

European Urology Oncology

Abstract:Background: First-line treatments for cisplatin-ineligible patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) include carboplatin-based chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitors such as atezplizumab (anti-PD-L1). Objective: To compare overall survival (OS) among patients with mUC treated in the first-line setting with atezolizumab versus carboplatin-based chemotherapies (any carboplatin-based regimens or carboplatin-gemcitabine). Design, setting, and participants: Cisplatin-ineligible patients with mUC from the phase 2 trial IMvigor210 (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02951767) treated with atezolizumab and patients from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) health care system (2006-2017, with IMvigor210 eligibility criteria applied using proxy measurements) treated according to normal clinical practice. Interventions: IMvigor210 cohort 1 patients were treated with atezolizumab, and real-world VHA cohorts were treated with carboplatin-based regimens. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Entropy-balance weighting was applied to balance prespecifled baseline patient characteristics. OS was analyzed using weighted Kaplan-Meier and Cox methods. Results and limitations: The median OS was 15.0 mo with atezolizumab (n = 110),12.1 mo with any carboplatin-based chemotherapy (n = 282), and 8.7 mo with carboplatin-gemcitabine (n = 120). An OS benefit occurred with atezolizumab versus carboplatin-based regimens after 9 mo (hazard ratio [FIR] 0.43; p = 0.004) and with atezolizumab versus carboplatin-gemcitabine after 5 mo (HR 0.52; p = 0.005). Study limitations include a predominantly male VHA cohort and <= 24-mo follow-up. Adjustment for confounding, a potential limitation of nonrandomized studies, was limited by the availability of clinical measurements in the VHA data, which allowed for replication of IMvigor210 exclusions in the VHA cohorts. Conclusions: First-line atezolizumab for cisplatin-ineligible mUC may provide an OS benefit over carboplatin-based treatments after 5-9 mo, depending on the regimen. Patient summary: Many patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma are ineligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. This study compared patients from a clinical trial receiving the immunotherapeutic agent atezolizumab with those in Veterans Health Administration clinical practice receiving carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Atezolizumab provided a survival benefit over chemotherapy after 5-9 mo. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology.