Numerical Studies of Coal Devolatilization Characteristics with Gas Temperature Fluctuation

Jiangkuan Xing,Yun Bai,Chunguang Zhao,Zhengwei Gao,Haiou Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b01361
IF: 4.6541
2018-01-01
Energy & Fuels
Abstract:In the present work, coal devolatilization characteristics in a hot gaseous environment with gas temperature fluctuation are investigated numerically with the chemical percolation devolatilization (CPD) model and the two-step (TS) model in a zero-dimensional configuration. The numerical results are first validated against the experimental data, showing that the CPD model can reproduce the coal devolatilization process well. The effects of mean gas temperature, gas temperature fluctuation amplitude, and coal particle size on coal devolatilization are then explored. The particle temperature is found to fluctuate with the gas temperature fluctuation at the same frequency. However, the particle temperature shows a delay in responding to the gas temperature fluctuation, with smaller particles having a shorter delay time. It is also found that the gas temperature fluctuation facilitates coal devolatilization. In particular, higher mean gas temperature and fluctuation amplitude values reduce the start time of the devolatilization and result in higher total volatile and tar yields. Smaller particles are more sensitive to gas temperature fluctuation and are easier and faster to devolatilize, producing more volatiles and tar. Compared to the CPD model, the devolatilization process predicted by the TS model generally starts earlier and the final volatile yield is overestimated. Moreover, the TS model predictions have a shorter delay time and larger fluctuation amplitude of coal particle temperature compared to the CPD model predictions, which indicates that the TS model is more apt to be affected by gas temperature fluctuation than the CPD model.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?