Does Quasi-Mandatory Dividend Rule Restrain Overinvestment?

Xiaoquan Wei,Chunfei Wang,Yunnan Guo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2018.07.001
IF: 3.399
2018-01-01
International Review of Economics & Finance
Abstract:We study the impact of a quasi-mandatory dividend rule on restraining corporate overinvestment in China. In 2008, the Chinese government adopted a regulation mandating that publicly listed firms pay out a minimum of 30% of their average earnings over the preceding 3 years as cash dividends before the firms can apply for SEOs. The 30% Rule in China is unique in the sense that it applies only to firms applying for SEOs. Our findings suggest that firms paying small dividends (but not meeting the 30% Rule) better restrain their overinvestment after the 30% Rule than the control firms. The 30% Rule, while meant to encourage firms to pay more dividends, pushes small-dividend firms to improve their investment efficiency by lowering the extent of overinvestment. For firms paying no dividends, we find that, after implementation of the 30% Rule, their overinvestment increases. Finally, we document that the impact of the 30% Rule on restraining overinvestment among small-dividend firms is attenuated if they have bad agency problems. Our findings offer policy implications for other emerging markets considering adopting mandatory dividend regulations.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?