Abstract:The adaptive cycle engine can vary the cycle in wider range and meet the requirement of mixed missions. It is expected to be the propulsion system for the next generation of aircraft and has therefore attracted a lot of attention. The uncertainty in component performance can offset the performance benefits of adaptive cycle engine. Therefore, the robust design should be applied at the engine performance design stage to reduce the effect of component performance uncertainty. Compared with conventional engines, the adaptive cycle engine has more variable geometry components. It causes two major difficulties for the robust design: one is the high computation cost and the other is the complex control law design. In this paper, a robust design method based on a two-level surrogate model and a two-stage design process is presented to overcome these difficulties. In this method, the probabilistic method is applied to quantify uncertainty and the selection principle of optimization target is studied. The cycle parameters and control law are optimized through a two-stage design process. The optimization is developed based on a two-level surrogate model to reduce the computational cost. This robust design method is validated by the Monte Carlo method. According to this study, performance under confidence probability is a better optimization target than the signal-to-noise ratio of performance. Using this method, the probability of engine performance meeting demand can be improved from about 50% to over 96%. The computational cost of uncertainty quantification is only 0.5% of the Monte Carlo method and the computational cost of whole optimization design process is less than the cost of once uncertainty quantification through Monte Carlo method. This method can improve the robustness of adaptive cycle engine performance and reduce the computational cost significantly. It can also be applied to the robust design of other complex gas turbine engines performance.

Robust Tolerance Optimization for Internal Combustion Engines under Parameter and Model Uncertainties Considering Metamodeling Uncertainty from Gaussian Processes

Robust Equilibrium Optimization of Structural Dynamic Characteristics Considering Different Working Conditions

Multi-Disciplinary Tolerance Optimization for Internal Combustion Engines Using Gaussian Process and Sequential Mdo Method

Simulation-Based Robust Design of Complex Product Considering Uncertainties of Metamodel, Design Variables, and Noise Parameters

Robust Optimization with Parameter and Model Uncertainties Using Gaussian Processes

Robust optimization with mixed interval and probabilistic parameter uncertainties, model uncertainty, and metamodeling uncertainty

Heterogeneous-Objective Robust Optimization of Complex Mechatronic Components Considering Interval Uncertainties

A Multi-Objective Robust Optimization Approach Based on Gaussian Process Model

A Surrogate Model-Assisted Robustness-Oriented Tolerance Design Method Based on ‘reverse Model’

Multidisciplinary Robust Design Optimization under Parameter and Model Uncertainties

Uncertainty-based Computational Robust Design Optimisation of Dual-Thrust Propulsion System

Robust Design Optimization of an Aerospace Vehicle Prolusion System

A New Methodology for Robust Optimizations of Optimal Design Problems under Interval Uncertainty

Robust Optimization of Uncertain Structures Based on Normalized Violation Degree of Interval Constraint

A Gaussian Process Modeling Approach for Fast Robust Design with Uncertain Inputs

A Gradient-Based Uncertainty Optimization Framework Utilizing Dimensional Adaptive Polynomial Chaos Expansion

Life‐cycle reliability‐based robust design optimization for GP model with response uncertainty

Optimization of Uncertain Structures with Interval Parameters Considering Objective and Feasibility Robustness

Robust Design of an Adaptive Cycle Engine Performance under Component Performance Uncertainty

Non-Probabilistic Robust Equilibrium Optimization of Complex Uncertain Structures

New Robust Optimization Approach Induced by Flexible Uncertainty Set: Optimization under Continuous Uncertainty