Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Amisulpride and Olanzapine for Patients with Schizophrenia in China

P. Men,Z. Yi,C. Li,S. Qu,T. Xiong,X. Yu,S. Zhai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2018.04.1259
IF: 5.156
2018-01-01
Value in Health
Abstract:Amisulpride was introduced into China in 2010 as a second-generation atypical antipsychotic, while olanzapine has been long used since 1996 and is one of the leading treatments for schizophrenia in China. This study aimed to investigate the long-term cost-effectiveness of amisulpride and olanzapine in the treatment of schizophrenia in China. A decision-analytic Markov model was developed to simulate the lifetime clinical and economic outcomes of schizophrenia treatment. The model had a 5-year and a lifetime horizon, and took the perspective of the National Health Service. Clinical data were obtained from a systematic review and meta-analysis that compared efficacy and safety of amisulpride versus olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia. Cost data were obtained from literature and interview with a panel of clinical experts. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was regarded as the primary outcome of the analysis. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the impact of essential variables on the results of the analysis. Treatment with amisulpride provided an effectiveness gain of 16.66 quality-adjusted life years at an average cost of RMB 26,077.44, whereas olanzapine brought 16.45 quality-adjusted life years at a cost of RMB 35,101.53 in a lifetime horizon. Thus, amisulpride is a dominant treatment compared to olanzapine. Amisulpride is also dominant over 5-year time horizon. One-way sensitivity analysis suggested that the most sensitive variable was the unit cost of olanzapine. In a probabilistic sensitivity analysis based on a Monte Carlo simulation, the probability of amisulpride being dominant was 75.1% and cost-effective was 100% at a willingness-to-pay threshold of 1 time GDP of 57,000 RMB per capita in China, which confirmed the robustness of the model. Amisulpride is likely to be a cost-saving with increased effectiveness option compared with olanzapine in the treatment of schizophrenia patient in China.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?