Abstract:Modern aircraft is a man-machine-cooperate complex system. The issues which affect the aviation safety gradually become human factors. Statistical reports show that more than 70% of the civil aircraft accidents are caused by human because of the misuse, abuse and disuse of the automatic systems. Several studies have been made, trying to reveal the reasons of human induced safety issues. Many of them consider workload as a main reason. Studies show that too high or too low of workload would both have higher probability of human errors. The state of art workload measurement techniques are generally organized into three broad categories: subjective rating scales, task performance measures and psychophysiological measures. There are some disadvantages in the conventional workload measuring techniques. Subjective rating scales couldn’t provide continuous evaluation in the flight task and the results could be affected by participants’ emotion and performance etc. The performance measures overlook the operator’s initiatives and effort. The mechanisms of the physiological reactions are complex, and the physiological measures could be easily contaminated by environmental changes such as illumination, pressure and vibration. We proposed a method to evaluate the human factors in a flight task based on multiple objective measures. In the presented method, the objective measures include the pilot’s eye activities, control activities, cardio-respiratory reactions and the flight status parameters. Principal component analysis was applied to integrate the above objective measures into four meaningful aspects. Meanwhile, in order to link the cockpit components (e.g. the displays and the control equipment) to the pilot and the flight performance, four correlation aspects were also considered which include the correlation between the pilot’s cognitive activity and the pilot’s arousal, the correlation between the pilot’s control activity and the pilot’s arousal, the correlation between the pilot’s cognitive activity and the flight performance and the correlation between the pilot’s control activity and the flight performance. These correlation aspects could provide diagnostic information in the assessment of the design of the cockpit components. We also constructed an eight-dimension pattern to integrate the above eight aspects and achieved an intuitive and continuous evaluation of the inflight human factors in the flight deck.

Ergonomic Evaluation of DSV Cockpit Console Based on Comprehensive Decision Making Method

A Study on Comprehensive Evaluation of Deep-Sea HOV Cockpit Console Based on Fuzzy Gravity Center

An Integrated Ergonomics Evaluation Method of HWDs

Aircraft Cockpit Ergonomic Layout Evaluation Based on Uncertain Linguistic Multiattribute Decision Making

Usability Evaluation Of The Cockpit Display System

Research on the method of ergonomics evaluation in manned submersibles cockpit

Aircraft cockpit ergonomic layout evaluation method research

Ergonomics Evaluation Of Cabin Human-Machine Interface Based On Shel Model

Multidimensional Cockpit Ergonomics Evaluation System

Study on Ergonomic Digital Evaluation System for the Naval Shipborne Command Cabin Based on Extended JACK

Multilevel Comprehensive Evaluation and Decision Making of Ergonomics

Evaluation of Cabin Design Based on the Method of Multiple Attribute Group Decision-Making.

Ergonomic Virtual Assessment for Cockpit Layout of Civil Aircraft

A ergonomics evaluation hierarchy for the typical manually controlled devices in spaceflight

An Evaluation Method Using Virtual Reality to Optimize Ergonomic Design in Manual Assembly and Maintenance Scenarios

Comfort Evaluation Method of Commercial Pilot Posture.

Human-Machine Engineering Virtual Simulation for the Wheelhouse on Large Ships

A comprehensive assessment of environmental factors in aircraft cockpit based on fuzzy evaluation

Consensus Intuitionistic Fuzzy Group Decision-Making Method for Aircraft Cockpit Display and Control System Evaluation

Review of Principles and Evaluation Methodologies for Cockpit Helmet-mounted Display Symbology

User-centered framework for assessing the performance of smart car cockpits