Satellites Reveal Earth's Seasonally Shifting Dust Emission Sources
Adrian Chappell,Nicholas P. Webb,Mark Hennen,Kerstin Schepanski,Philippe Ciais,Yves Balkanski,Charles S. Zender,Ina Tegen,Zhenzhong Zeng,Daniel Tong,Barry Baker,Marie Ekstroem,Matthew Baddock,Frank D. Eckardt,Tarek Kandakji,Jeffrey A. Lee,Mohamad Nobakht,Johanna von Holdt,John F. Leys
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163452
IF: 9.8
2023-01-01
The Science of The Total Environment
Abstract:Establishing mineral dust impacts on Earth's systems requires numerical models of the dust cycle. Differences between dust optical depth (DOD) measurements and modelling the cycle of dust emission, atmospheric transport, and deposi-tion of dust indicate large model uncertainty due partially to unrealistic model assumptions about dust emission fre-quency. Calibrating dust cycle models to DOD measurements typically in North Africa, are routinely used to reduce dust model magnitude. This calibration forces modelled dust emissions to match atmospheric DOD but may hide the correct magnitude and frequency of dust emission events at source, compensating biases in other modelled pro-cesses of the dust cycle. Therefore, it is essential to improve physically based dust emission modules. Here we use a global collation of satellite observations from previous studies of dust emission point source (DPS) di-chotomous frequency data. We show that these DPS data have little-to-no relation with MODIS DOD frequency. We calibrate the albedo-based dust emission model using the frequency distribution of those DPS data. The global dust emission uncertainty constrained by DPS data (+/- 3.8 kg m-2 y-1) provides a benchmark for dust emission model de-velopment. Our calibrated model results reveal much less global dust emission (29.1 +/- 14.9 Tg y-1) than previous estimates, and show seasonally shifting dust emission predominance within and between hemispheres, as opposed to a persistent North African dust emission primacy widely interpreted from DOD measurements. Earth's largest dust emissions, proceed seasonally from East Asian deserts in boreal spring, to Middle Eastern and North African deserts in boreal summer and then Australian shrublands in boreal autumn-winter. This new analysis of dust emissions, from global sources of varying geochemical properties, have far-reaching implications for current and fu-ture dust-climate effects. For more reliable coupled representation of dust-climate projections, our findings suggest the need to re-evaluate dust cycle modelling and benefit from the albedo-based parameterisation.