Tu1191 ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION FOR SENIOR ESOPHAGUS CANCER PATIENT WITH RELATIVE INDICATION BASED ON JES GUIDELINE: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY FROM CHIAN

Zhipeng Qi,Bing Li,Yunshi Zhong,Pinghong Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2018.04.2221
IF: 10.396
2018-01-01
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Abstract:According to the Japanese Esophageal Society (JES) Guidelines, early esophagus squamous cancer (EESC) involving the M3 or SM1 are relative indications (RI) for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Additional esophagectomy or chemoradiotherapy was recommended for the RI patients after clinical and histopathological evaluation. But most senior (≥60 years) RI patients in China refused additional treatment due to the debilitating symptoms. This study was aim to evaluate the long-term outcomes of senior RI patients without additional treatment after ESD. Between January 2008 and December 2013, 158 senior patients were included and analyzed. 89 patients were included in the absolute indication (AI) group and 69 in the RI group. The baseline characteristics were balance between the two groups. During 56 (1-108) months follow-up, the postoperative stricture rates were similar in both group (31.8% vs 21.3%, p=0.134). The hazard ratio (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS) in the AI group versus the RI group was 1.025 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.355-2.954, P=0.964]. The 5-year PFS rates was 90.5% (95% CI, 83.444-97.556) and 90.8% (95% CI,83.744-97.856) for the AI and RI group, respectively. The HR for overall survival (OS) in the AI group versus the RI group was 0.564 (95% CI, 0.126-2.520, P=0.453). The 5-year OS rates were 96.6% (95% CI, 92.876-100) for the AI group and 95.6% (95% CI,90.7-100) for the RI group. Regular follow-up without additional treatment may be considered another choice for senior RI EESC patients after ESD based on this study.Tabled 1Table 1. The adverse events and prognosis outcome in the absolute indication group and relative indication groupAbsolute indication group n=89Relative indication group n=69P ValueAdverse Event, n (%)Postoperative stricture19 (21.3%)22 (31.8%)0.134Prognosis, n (%)Recurrence8 (9.0%)5 (7.2%)0.693Metastasis0 (0%)1 (1.4%)0.437Death3 (3.4%)4 (5.8%)0.730Death due to EESC0 (0%)1 (1.4%)0.437 Open table in a new tab
What problem does this paper attempt to address?