Study of the Driving Factors for Changing Energy Intensity Trend in China --based on the LMDI Decomposition Analysis
郑义,徐康宁
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19616/j.cnki.bmj.2012.02.004
2012-01-01
Abstract:Global warming has been one of the most important environmental problems of our ages. The ever increasing amount of carbon dioxide, the dominant contributor to the greenhouse effect seems to be aggravating this problem. Academics and practitioner alike have been debating about reducing greenhouse gas（GHG） emissions to alleviate global warming. As to China, Since the start of economic reform in 1978, It has experienced spectacular economic growth and it has been the second largest energy consumer and the largest energy-related CO2 emitter on earth. As a developing country, China is one of the highest growth economies in the world, the average annual growth rate of GDP has increased at 10% annually over the past 15 years. Industry grew by an even faster rate, more than 12% from 1994 to 2008. But, over the same period, commercial energy consumption increased by only 4.5% （NBSC）. By 2008 commercial energy intensity had decreased by 33% compared to 1978. Energy intensity declined in every year up till 2008 except for 2003 and 2004. However, since 2000 the decline in energy intensity slowed and energy intensity actually increased from 2003 to 2004. Most previous studies found that most of the decline was due to technological change, but disagreed on the role of structural change. Huang （ 1993 ） found that technical change within sectors accounted for most of the fall in the energy intensity, and Garbaccio et al. （1999） found structural change actually increased the use of energy. However Fisher-Vanden et al. （2003） found that proportion of the change in energy intensity explained by structural change rose as the level of disaggregation becomes finer. Ma, C. , Stern, D （2008） found thattechnological change was confirmed as the dominant contributor to the decline in energy intensity and structural change at the industry and sector （sub-industry） level actuallyincreased energy intensity over the period of 1980 -2003, the structural change at the industry level was very different in the 1980s and in the post 1990 period. To the best of our knowledge, few decomposition studies have investigated the role of inter-fuel substitution in the decline in energy intensity or the causes of the rise in energy intensity from 2003 to 2004. as the energy composition of an economy changes, the overall energy intensity would change as well due to the differences in quality of the various energy carriers, given a constant level of technology and composition of output. In all previous studies of China＇s energy intensity inter-fuel substitution is subsumed into technological change. In this paper, Based on the logarithmic mean Divisia index （LMDI） techniques, we apply a more detailed decomposition analysis to a longer period than any previous study of China＇s energy intensity, decomposing changes in energy intensity in the period 1994-2008 and investigating the causes of this reversal in the trend, separating energy substitution effect from technological change effect. Based on the three lays （3industries ,6sectors and 43sub-industries） , we use logarithmic mean Divisia index （LMDI） techniques to decompose changes in energy intensity in the period 1994 -2008. Empirical studies are not consistent with previous empirical studies which indicate that the technological effect not only explains most of the decline in China＇s energy intensity over the entire period of economic reform, the slowdown and reversal of the technological effect also becomes the major reason for stagnancy during 1988 - 1990 and the new trend since 2000. Our results indicate that： technological change effect is confirmed as the dominant contributor to the decline in energy intensity; structural change effect at the industry level increased energy intensity over the period of 1994 2004 and actually decreased energy intensity over the period of 2004 - 2008, structural change effect at the sector level increased energy intensity overall, structural change effect at the sub-sectors decreased energy intensity over the period of 2002 -2008; energy substitution effect is found to decreased energy intensity overall and the explanatory power of which is little, we found the reversal of decline in energy intensity is not from little change of technological effect but major change of structural change effect at the industry level over the period of 2003 - 2004.