Evaluation of Different Flamelet Tabulation Methods for Laminar Spray Combustion

Yujuan Luo,Xu Wen,Haiou Wang,Kun Luo,Jianren Fan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5026739

IF: 4.6

2018-01-01

Physics of Fluids

Abstract:In this work, three different flamelet tabulation methods for spray combustion are evaluated. Major differences among these methods lie in the treatment of the temperature boundary conditions of the flamelet equations. Particularly, in the first tabulation method (“M1”), both the fuel and oxidizer temperature boundary conditions are set to be fixed. In the second tabulation method (“M2”), the fuel temperature boundary condition is varied while the oxidizer temperature boundary condition is fixed. In the third tabulation method (“M3”), both the fuel and oxidizer temperature boundary conditions are varied and set to be equal. The focus of this work is to investigate whether the heat transfer between the droplet phase and gas phase can be represented by the studied tabulation methods through a priori analyses. To this end, spray flames stabilized in a three-dimensional counterflow are first simulated with detailed chemistry. Then, the trajectory variables are calculated from the detailed chemistry solutions. Finally, the tabulated thermo-chemical quantities are compared to the corresponding values from the detailed chemistry solutions. The comparisons show that the gas temperature cannot be predicted by “M1” with only a mixture fraction and reaction progress variable being the trajectory variables. The gas temperature can be correctly predicted by both “M2” and “M3,” in which the total enthalpy is introduced as an additional manifold. In “M2,” variations of the oxidizer temperature are considered with a temperature modification technique, which is not required in “M3.” Interestingly, it is found that the mass fractions of the reactants and major products are not sensitive to the representation of the interphase heat transfer in the flamelet chemtables, and they can be correctly predicted by all tabulation methods. By contrast, the intermediate species CO and H2 in the premixed flame reaction zone are over-predicted by all tabulation methods.