Effect of Organic Carbon on Tertiary Denitrification of the Secondary Effluent in Biofilters Packed with Suspended Carriers

Yunhong Shi,Yingxue Sun,Nan Wei,Guangxue Wu,Hongying Hu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/s1063455x18020042
2018-01-01
Journal of Water Chemistry and Technology
Abstract:Denitrifying biokinetics in biofilters packed with suspended carriers were evaluated under different empty bed residence times (EBRT) with ethanol or acetate as the electron donor. The two denitrifying biofilters removed nitrate (NO 3 – –N) effectively after only 3–4 days operation. At EBRT of 30; 15 and 7.5 min, the NO 3 – –N removal percentage was 84; 72 and 59% in the ethanol biofilter, and was 89; 70 and 62% in the acetate biofilter, respectively. With the influent NO 3 – –N loading rate ranged from 0.4 to 1.8 g/(m 2 ·d), the NO 3 – –N removal loading rate increased with increasing influent NO 3 – –N loading rates, and the system was substrate limited. While when the influent nitrate loading rate was above 3 g/(m 2 ·d), the system was biomass limited. The half-order coefficients were 0.162; 0.175 and 0.274 (mg/L) 1/2 /min for the ethanol biofilter with the influent NO 3 – –N concentration of 7.3–7.7 mg/L, and were 0.107; 0.165 and 0.303 (mg/L) 1/2 /min for the acetate biofilter with the influent NO 3 – –N concentration of 6.8–8.0 mg/L. Denitrification efficiency varied slightly during the backwashing cycle, and the effect of backwashing on the effluent turbidity was relatively large, especially for the biofilter with ethanol as the organic carbon.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?