Abstract:In cosmological analyses it is common to combine different types of measurement from the same survey. In this paper we use simulated DES Y3 and LSST Y1 data to explore differences in sensitivity to intrinsic alignments (IA) between cosmic shear and galaxy-galaxy lensing. We generate mock shear, galaxy-galaxy lensing and galaxy clustering data, contaminated with a range of IA scenarios. Using a simple 2-parameter IA model (NLA) in a DES Y3 like analysis, we show that the galaxy-galaxy lensing + galaxy clustering combination ($2\times2$pt) is significantly more robust to IA mismodelling than cosmic shear. IA scenarios that produce up to $5\sigma$ biases for shear are seen to be unbiased at the level of $\sim1\sigma$ for $2\times2$pt. We demonstrate that this robustness can be largely attributed to the redshift separation in galaxy-galaxy lensing, which provides a cleaner separation of lensing and IA contributions. We identify secondary factors which may also contribute, including the possibility of cancellation of higher-order IA terms in $2\times2$pt and differences in sensitivity to physical scales. Unfortunately this does not typically correspond to equally effective self-calibration in a $3\times2$pt analysis of the same data, which can show significant biases driven by the cosmic shear part of the data vector. If we increase the precision of our mock analyses to a level roughly equivalent to LSST Y1, we find a similar pattern, with considerably more bias in a cosmic shear analysis than a $2\times2$pt one, and significant bias in a joint analysis of the two. Our findings suggest that IA model error can manifest itself as internal tension between $\xi_\pm$ and $\gamma_t + w$ data vectors. We thus propose that such tension (or the lack thereof) can be employed as a test of model sufficiency or insufficiency when choosing a fiducial IA model, alongside other data-driven methods.

Verifications of Scaling Relations Useful for the Intrinsic Alignment Self-Calibration

Unveiling the Intrinsic Alignment of Galaxies with Self-Calibration and DECaLS DR3 Data

Effects of Galaxy Intrinsic Alignment on Weak Lensing Peak Statistics

A Proposal on the Galaxy Intrinsic Alignment Self-Calibration in Weak Lensing Surveys

First Detection of the GI-type of Intrinsic Alignments of Galaxies Using the Self-calibration Method in a Photometric Galaxy Survey

Separating the Intrinsic Alignment Signal and the Lensing Signal Using Self-Calibration in Photo-Z Surveys with KiDS450 and KV450 Data

Self calibration of gravitational shear-galaxy intrinsic ellipticity correlation in weak lensing surveys

Full-sky Ray-tracing Simulation of Weak Lensing Using ELUCID Simulations: Exploring Galaxy Intrinsic Alignment and Cosmic Shear Correlations

Joint constraints from cosmic shear, galaxy-galaxy lensing and galaxy clustering: internal tension as an indicator of intrinsic alignment modelling error

Intrinsic alignment from multiple shear estimates: A first application to data and forecasts for Stage IV

An Empirical Model For Intrinsic Alignments: Insights From Cosmological Simulations

KiDS-1000: Cross-correlation with Planck cosmic microwave background lensing and intrinsic alignment removal with self-calibration

Third-order intrinsic alignment of SDSS BOSS LOWZ galaxies

A halo model for intrinsic alignments of galaxy ellipticities

Intrinsic Alignments of Galaxies in the Illustris Simulation

Galaxy Alignment on Large and Small Scales

Learning Galaxy Intrinsic Alignment Correlations

Density‐Ellipticity Correlations, Galaxy‐Galaxy Lensing, and the Importance of Non‐Gaussianity in Intrinsic Alignment

The MillenniumTNG Project: Intrinsic alignments of galaxies and halos

Improving redshift-space power spectra of halo intrinsic alignments from perturbation theory