478 Comparison of Two Generation Photosensitizers of PsD-007 and HMME Photodynamic Therapy for Treatment of Port-Wine Stain: A Retrospective Study

G. Ma,Y. Han,P. Wu,X. Lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2018.03.485
2018-01-01
Abstract:Background: Vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy (PDT) has shown potentially beneficial results in treating port-wine stain (PWS), but the efficacy and safety of different photosensitizers has not been fully investigated. Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of two generation photosensitizers- PsD-007 and HMME combined with a 532 nm KTP laser for photodynamic therapy of port-wine stainPatients and methods: Medical records of 38 patients (age range: 16-44 years old) with port-wine stains were analyzed. Clinical outcomes after one session of PsD-007(n=21) or HMME (n=17) combined with 532 nm KTP laser irradiation (80-90 mW/cm2) PDT were compared. Results: Both photographic and chromameter optical evaluation showed no significant difference between PsD-007 group and HMME group, respectively (P=0.337, P=0.191). Total response rate was 76.2% (n=16) and 88.2% (n=15) in PsD-007 and HMME group. 42.9% patients were assessed as excellent and good clearance for PsD-007 group and 29.4% for the other. Incidences of swelling, pruritus, scab, and other adverse reactions were similar and there were no blister, scar or hypopigmentation in both groups. Conclusion: Both PsD-007 and HMME PDT are effective and safe tools to treat port-wine stains. However, in terms of photosensitivity period, HMME is a superior photosensitizer to PsD-007.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?