Abstract:Modelling the volatility has attracted a great deal of attention in the literature of financial economics and econometrics.As a measure of risk,volatility modelling is important to researchers,policy makers and regulators as it is closely related to the stability of financial markets,and the SV models are used to model the dynamics of volatility.It has been well-documented in the literature that the volatility exhibits two typical features,namely the asymmetric effects (include leverage and size effects) on volatility caused by previous returns and the long-range dependence in volatility.It is important to accommodate these features in volatility in the SV models.In recent years,high-frequency financial data is available and a number of realized measures of volatility have been introduced,including realized volatility and realized range volatility.These measures are far more informative about the current level of volatility than the daily returns.Standard SV models utilizes daily returns to extract information about the current level of volatility.A shortcoming of conventional SV models is the fact that returns are rather weak signals about the level of volatility.This makes SV models poorly suited for situations where volatility changes rapidly to a new level.Incorporating realized measures into SV models is expected to alleviate this problem.Based on the above analysis,in this paper the two-factor asymmetric realized SV (2FARSV) model is proposed,which incorporates the basic SV model (which uses daily returns) with asymmetric effects (leverage and size effects),long memory property of the volatility and high-frequency intraday information provided by the realized measure by taking account of the realized measure biases.A maximum likelihood estimation method based on the continuous particle filters is used to estimate the parameters of the 2FARSV model.The monte Carlo simulation study shows that the estimation method performs well.The 2FARSV model is appiled to the realized volatility (RV) and realized range volatility (RRV) computed from the high-frequency intraday data of Shanghai Stock Exchange composite index and Shenzhen Stock Exchange component index.The results show that the RV and RRV are (downward) biased estimators of the true daily volatility.This implies that the effect of non-trading hours is stronger than that of microstructure noise.The RRV is the more effective volatility estimator than the RV,but it leads to more downward bias.In addition,evidence of strong volatility persistence and volatility asymmetry (leverage and size effects) is detected in Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets.According to the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC),the 2FARSV model fits the data better than the one-factor asymmetric realized SV (1FARSV) model,the two-factor realized SV (2FRSV) model,the two-factor leverage realized SV (2FLRSV) model and the realized GARCH model.Model diagnostics suggest that the 2FARSV model is sufficient to capture the dynamics of the volatility (time-varying volatility,volatility clustering,volatility asymmetry and long memory property of the volatility).This study enriches the empirical research on the volatility modelling based on the high-frequency data.It's also a worthwhile endeavor to further investigate the performance of the 2FARSV model in asset pricing and value-at-risk calculation.

Distribution of Historic Market Data – Implied and Realized Volatility

Prediction of Volatility Based on Realized-Garch-kernel-type Models: Evidence from China and the U.S.

Volatility Risk Premium, Good Volatility and Bad Volatility: Evidence from SSE 50 ETF Options

Implied volatility surfaces: a comprehensive analysis using half a billion option prices

Estimating of CVaR with Consideration of Realized Volatility and Price Range

Forecasting Stock Market Volatility Using Implied Volatility

Beyond the Traditional VIX: A Novel Approach to Identifying Uncertainty Shocks in Financial Markets

On implied volatility for options—Some reasons to smile and more to correct

VIX Term Structure and VIX Futures Pricing with Realized Volatility

Does VIX Truly Measure Return Volatility?

The VIX as Stochastic Volatility for Corporate Bonds

High-Frequency Causality in the VIX Index and its derivatives: Empirical Evidence

The volume-implied volatility relation in financial markets: A behavioral explanation

Heterogeneous Volatility Information Content for the Realized GARCH Modeling and Forecasting Volatility

A Markovian empirical model for the VIX index and the pricing of the corresponding derivatives

Roughness of the Implied Volatility

Threshold Realized Stochastic Volatility Model and its Empirical Test

Analysis of Option Trading Strategies Based on the Relation of Implied and Realized S&P500 Volatilities

Volatility Parametrizations with Random Coefficients: Analytic Flexibility for Implied Volatility Surfaces

Implied Volatilities of S&P 100 Index with Applications to Financial Market.

Two-factor Asymmetric Realized SV Model and Its Empirical Test