Abstract:Background: Unlike diagnoses in other branches of medicine, current classification of psychiatric disorders relies on phenomenological observations, despite the increasing evidence pointing to superior characterization by physiological-based markers. Common risk genes, symptoms, and medications had been found between patients traditionally diagnosed with schizophrenia, schizoaffective, and bipolar disorder with psychosis. To address this issue, and to ultimately achieve customizable treatment plans for illnesses with psychotic features, identification of biomarkers for psychosis and their criteria is essential. Methods: Part of Bipolar-Schizophrenia Network on Intermediate Phenotypes (B-SNIP), the present study was conducted in continuation of previous work that identified psychosis Biotypes (Clementz et al., 2016), and it included 709 probands with psychotic features and 342 control subjects. In addition to the biomarker panel used in Clementz et al. (2016), this iteration included additional biomarkers capturing variance in ocular motor performance, inhibition, and cognitive control. Similar multivariate analysis procedures were used. Birchwood Social Functioning Scale and structural MRI characteristics from Freesurfer analyses were used as validators of cluster membership. Results: On average, probands showed lower cognitive performance, lower accuracy to motor tasks, and lower EEG power to auditory stimuli than controls. Interestingly, these anomalies were not ubiquitous among the probands. From within-task principle component analysis (PCA) and k-means clustering, 4 (rather than 3 as previously reported by Clementz et al.) phenotypically distinct proband groups emerged: Group 4 had hyperactive motor response and low cognitive control; Group 3 showed normal cognition and motor control but abnormally low EEG amplitude in response to auditory stimuli; Group 2 was slow in motor tasks combined with poor cognitive control, and Group 1 performed more similarly to controls across tasks. Social functioning scale confirmed with these findings: a significant difference in total score was found between groups, with Group 1 scoring similarly to control subjects, higher than the other 3 (F(3, 560) = 3.882, P = .009). Various cortical regions involved in motor and executive functions, including middle temporal and superior frontal areas, showed drastic differences in volume and thickness across groups (all Ps < .001). Conclusion: Four clusters within probands showing non-unified structural differences, increments in cognitive deficits, and low reactivity to auditory inputs in only one group suggested a high degree of heterogeneity among psychotic populations that does not necessarily conform to traditional diagnoses. Investigation to psychosis phenotypes at network and circuit level will help further discern disease subtypes and refine diagnoses and prescription guidelines.

108. Consolidation Across Multiple Levels of Analysis for Parsing Biological Heterogeneity in Psychosis

Neuroanatomical Heterogeneity and Homogeneity in Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis

Dimensional and Categorical Solutions to Parsing Depression Heterogeneity in a Large Single-Site Sample

Clinical Psychology in the Era of Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDoC): Reconciling Individually-Focused Practice with a Broader Biopsychosocial Context

Research Domain Criteria: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Potential Alternatives for Future Psychiatric Research

RDoC Framework Through the Lens of Predictive Processing: Focusing on Cognitive Systems Domain

STRUCTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING FINDINGS IN THE BSNIP PSYCHOSIS CONSORTIUM

The Structure of Psychosis Revisited: the Role of Mood Symptoms

Does Biology Transcend the Symptom-based Boundaries of Psychosis?

Neurobiologically Based Stratification of Recent- Onset Depression and Psychosis: Identification of Two Distinct Transdiagnostic Phenotypes

Identification of Distinct Psychosis Biotypes Using Brain-Based Biomarkers

Challenges and ways forward in bridging units of analysis in clinical psychological science.

A Trans-Diagnostic Perspective on Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Levels of analysis and explanatory progress in psychology: Integrating frameworks from biology and cognitive science for a more comprehensive science of the mind.

Reimagining psychoses: an agnostic approach to diagnosis.

M61. Data-Driven Approach Identified Functionally and Physiologically Distinct Psychosis Subtypes

Decoding Early Psychoses: Unraveling Stable Microstructural Features Associated with Psychopathology Across Independent Cohorts

Categorical and Dimensional Approaches for Psychiatric Classification and Treatment Targeting: Considerations from Psychosis Biotypes.

Term Standardization and Normalization for Research Domain Criteria (RDoC)

Association of RDoC dimensions with post-mortem brain transcriptional profiles in Alzheimers Disease