PD66-05 INTRAOPERATIVE FROZEN SECTION EVALUATION OF THE TUMOR AND ITS BASE IN PATIENTS WITH T1 UROTHELIAL BLADDER CANCER UNDERWENT TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION

Yijun Shen,Dingwei Ye

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.3001

IF: 7.6

2018-01-01

The Journal of Urology

Abstract:You have accessJournal of UrologyBladder Cancer: Non-invasive III1 Apr 2018PD66-05 INTRAOPERATIVE FROZEN SECTION EVALUATION OF THE TUMOR AND ITS BASE IN PATIENTS WITH T1 UROTHELIAL BLADDER CANCER UNDERWENT TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION Yijun Shen and Dingwei Ye Yijun ShenYijun Shen More articles by this author and Dingwei YeDingwei Ye More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.3001AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBt) remains the gold standard for management of bladder cancer, but there is evidence of a high rate of understaging for T1 tumor after primary resection. Muscle in the specimen is important for the accurate bladder staging. However, nearly 40% resected bladder specimens were failed to be found muscle after the initial TURBt even done by the sophistic urologists. Therefore a second TURBt was justified for correcting the staging error and removing the residual tumors. The frozen section examination can provide a rapid microscopic analysis of a specimen. In this study, we retrospectively investigated the tumor base and whether muscle was present in the specimen using frozen section examination, and discussed its value in the initial TURBt. METHODS From Jun 2011 to Oct 2016, a total of 95 consecutive patients with T1 bladder cancer were included in this study. A standard TURBt was performed. Once the tumor was removed, the tumor base was either biopsied using cold-cup biopsy forceps or resected. An aliquot of resected tumor as well as the tumor base were both sent for pathological frozen section examination in a separate labeled pot. Then a repeat resection was performed based on the pathological findings either if cancer cells were present in the tumor base or the muscle was present in the specimen. The results, including positive tumor base, presence of muscle in the specimen, tumor stage, residual tumor and concordance between frozen section and paraffin embedded section were compared. RESULTS 26(27.4%) patients had a positive tumor base. 54(56.8%) tumor bases were found muscle in the specimen while 34(35.8%) were not found and 7(7.4%)were difficult to diagnosis because of the over-cauterization of the base specimen. Of 52(54.7%) patients who underwent a repeat resection, 18(34.6%) were found residual tumor and 15(27.8%) were upstaged to muscle invasive tumor. The paraffin embedded section demonstrated 32(61.5%)specimen were found muscle in patients undergoing the repeat resection. The concordance of muscle in the specimen between the frozen section and paraffin embedded section was 94.7%. CONCLUSIONS The frozen section examination was justified for the diagnoses of positive tumor base and muscle in the specimen, and it can help to remove the residual tumors and decrease the staging error for T1 urothelial bladder cancer during the initial TURBt. © 2018FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 199Issue 4SApril 2018Page: e1231-e1232 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2018MetricsAuthor Information Yijun Shen More articles by this author Dingwei Ye More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...