A Cellular Senescence-Related Gene Prognostic Index for Biochemical Recurrence and Drug Resistance in Patients with Prostate Cancer.
Dechao Feng,Xu Shi,Jia You,Qiao Xiong,Weizhen Zhu,Qiang Wei,Lu Yang
2022-01-01
Abstract:In this study, we aimed to establish a novel cellular senescence-related gene prognostic index (CSG PI) to predict biochemical recurrence (BCR) and drug resistance in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) undergoing radical radiotherapy or prostatectomy. We performed all analyses using R version 3.6.3 and its suitable packages. Cytoscape 3.8.2 was used to establish a network of transcription factors and competing endogenous RNAs. Three cellular senescence-related genes were used to establish the CSGPI. We observed that CSGPI was an independent risk factor for BCR in PCa patients (HR: 2.62; 95% CI: 1.55-4.44), consistent with the results of external validation (HR: 1.88; 95% CI: 1.12-3.14). The CSGPI had a moderate diagnostic effect on drug resistance (AUC: 0.812, 95% CI: 0.586-1.000). The lncRNA PART1 was significantly associated with BCR (HR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.27-0.77), and might modulate the mRNA expression of definitive genes through interactions with 57 miRNAs. Gene set enrichment analysis indicated that CSGPI was closely related to ECM receptor interaction, focal adhesion, TGF beta signaling pathway, pathway in cancer, regulation of actin cytoskeleton, and so on. Immune checkpoint analysis showed that PDCD1LG2 and CD96 were significantly higher in the BCR group compared to non-BCR group, and patients with higher expression of CD96 were more prone to BCR than their counterparts (HR: 1.79; 95% CI: 1.06-3.03). In addition, the CSGPI score was significantly associated with the mRNA expression of HAVCR2, CD96, and CD47. Analysis of mismatch repair and methyltransferase genes showed that DNMT3B was more highly expressed in the BCR group and that patients with higher expression of DNMT3B experienced a higher risk of BCR (HR: 2.08; 95% CI: 1.23-3.52). We observed that M1 macrophage, CD8+ T cells, stromal score, immune score, and ESTIMATE score were higher in the BCR group. In contrast, tumor purity was less scored in the BCR group. Spearman analysis revealed a positive relationship between CSGPI and M1 macrophages, CD4+ T cells, dendritic cells, stromal score, immune score, and ESTIMATE score. In conclusion, we found that the CSGPI might serve as a biomarker to predict BCR and drug resistance in PCa patients. Moreover, CD96 and DNMT3B might be potential treatment targets, and immune evasion might contribute to the BCR process of PCa.