Abstract:The camera provides rich visual information regarding objects and becomes one of the most mainstream sensors in the automation community. However, it is often difficult to be applicable when the objects are not visually distinguished. On the other hand, tactile sensors can be used to capture multiple object properties, such as textures, roughness, spatial features, compliance, and friction, and therefore provide another important modality for the perception. Nevertheless, effective combination of the visual and tactile modalities is still a challenging problem. In this paper, we develop a visual–tactile fusion framework for object recognition tasks. This paper uses the multivariate-time-series model to represent the tactile sequence and the covariance descriptor to characterize the image. Further, we design a joint group kernel sparse coding (JGKSC) method to tackle the intrinsically weak pairing problem in visual–tactile data samples. Finally, we develop a visual–tactile data set, composed of 18 household objects for validation. The experimental results show that considering both visual and tactile inputs is beneficial and the proposed method indeed provides an effective strategy for fusion. Note to Practitioners—Visual and tactile measurements offer complementary properties that make them particularly suitable for fusion in order to address the robust and accurate recognition of objects, which is a necessity for many automation systems. In this paper, we investigate a widely applicable scenario in grasp manipulation. When identifying an object, the manipulator may see it using the camera and touch it using its hand. Thus, we obtain a pair of test samples, including one image sample and one tactile sample. The manipulator then utilizes this sample pair to identify this object with a classifier that is constructed using the previously collected training samples. However, when collecting training samples, we may collect the image samples and the tactile samples separately. In other words, the training samples may not be paired, while the test samples are paired. This paper addresses this practical problem by developing a JGKSC method, which encourages the effects of the same group, but different atoms. Although our focus is on combining visual and tactile information, the described problem framework is common in the automation community. The algorithm described in this paper can therefore work with weak pairings between a variety of sensors.

Active Visual-Tactile Cross-Modal Matching.

Seeing By Touching: Cross-Modal Matching For Tactile And Vision Measurements

Visual–Tactile Fusion for Object Recognition

Surface Material Retrieval Using Weakly Paired Cross-Modal Learning

Cross-Modal Surface Material Retrieval Using Discriminant Adversarial Learning

Learning Explicit and Implicit Latent Common Spaces for Audio-Visual Cross-Modal Retrieval

Cross-Modal Material Perception for Novel Objects: A Deep Adversarial Learning Method

Lifelong Visual-Tactile Cross-Modal Learning for Robotic Material Perception

Localizing the Object Contact through Matching Tactile Features with Visual Map

A Case Study on Visual-Audio-Tactile Cross-Modal Retrieval

Online Weakly Paired Similarity Learning for Surface Material Retrieval.

Cross-Modal Reconstruction for Tactile Signal in Human-Robot Interaction

Learning Self-Supervised Representations from Vision and Touch for Active Sliding Perception of Deformable Surfaces

Multimodal Visual-Tactile Representation Learning through Self-Supervised Contrastive Pre-Training

Object Recognition Using Tactile and Image Information.

Bidirectional visual-tactile cross-modal generation using latent feature space flow model

Matching in the Wild: Learning Anatomical Embeddings for Multi-Modality Images

Visual–Tactile Fusion Object Recognition Using Joint Sparse Coding

Robot Synesthesia: In-Hand Manipulation with Visuotactile Sensing

Multi-label Tactile Property Analysis.

Visual–tactile fusion material identification using dictionary learning