Effects of Stickwater Hydrolysates on Growth Performance for Yellow Catfish (pelteobagrus Fulvidraco)

Daiwu Wu,Luyang Zhou,Minmin Gao,Mengying Wang,Bing Wang,Jie He,Qigang Luo,Yuantu Ye,Chunfang Cai,Ping Wu,Yinzhao Zhang,Qinhua Pu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.01.031

IF: 5.135

2018-01-01

Aquaculture

Abstract:The intention of this study is to investigate the effects of stickwater hydrolysates on growth performance for yellow catfish (Pelteobagrus fulvidraco) fed with non-fish meal diets. Two experiments were designed. Experiment (A) was conducted to evaluate the effects of stickwater hydrolysates which were prepared by different methods. Ten diets were prepared: the control diet used fish meal as the main protein source and other nine non-fish meal diets were formulated with stickwater (SW), stickwater hydrolysate (HSW) or stickwater hydrolysate meal (HSM), supplying approximate 25%, 50% or 75% of fish meal protein in the control diet. Experiment (B) was conducted to determine how peptide and free amino acid content of HSW influence growth performance of fish. Ten diets were prepared: the control diet used fish meal as the main protein source and other nine non-fish meal diets were formulated with low degree of hydrolyzed stickwater hydrolysate (L-HSW), middle degree of hydrolyzed stickwater hydrolysate (M-HSW) or high degree of hydrolyzed stickwater hydrolysate (H-HSW), supplying approximate 15, 30 or 45% of fish meal protein in the control diet. All diets were fed to three replicate groups of yellow catfish (initial body weight of 15.67 +/- 0.11 g for experiment A and 18.67 +/- 0.11 g for experiment B) for 60 days. High weight gain was achieved in yellow catfish fed with HSW25 and M-HSW30, in which the fish in-fish out values (FIFO) were only about 27% to 32% of control diet. Growth performance of fish fed SW diets was significantly reduced compared to the control diet. No significant (P > 0.05) differences in SGR, FCR, PRR, and FRR were found in the fish fed with the HSW diets compared to the control diet. The weight gain had no significant (P > 0.05) differences among fish fed L-HSW30, M-HSW30, and basal diet, but it significantly reduced in fish fed H-HSW diets. Decreasing tendency of fish growth performance was obtained when we increase the content of SW, SHW, and SHM in diets, while the relative expression of PepT1 was significantly down-regulated. The present work gives evidence on the multi-dimensional effects of different SW hydrolysates on fish growth performance. These results suggest that in the commercial diet pattern containing same nitrogen, energy, phosphorus, and sum amino acid, we observed the equivalent biological valve between fish fed with HSW25 or M-HSW30 and basal diet. This indicates that stickwater hydrolysate is a promising fish meal replacement and the optimal level in diet is approximately 80 to 90 g kg(-1) (dry matter), in which the FIFO value was only about 27% to 32% of the control diet. Poorer growth performance was observed in the fish fed with diets contain SW and hydrolysates (dry matter)> 130 g kg(-1). Besides, the H-HSW was not a good option for yellow catfish. It may be because of the considerable small nitrogen compounds of lower than 500 Da, which lead to high serum free amino acid and eventually result in the low digestion and absorption of protein by modulating the mRNA expression levels of PepT1.