Abstract:The science of modelling choice preferences has evolved into an interdisciplinary field contributing to several branches of microeconomics and mathematical psychology. As theories in decision science and related fields mature, descriptive theories have emerged to explain systematic violations of rationality through cognitive mechanisms underlying the thought processes that guide human behaviour. Cognitive limitations are not, however, solely responsible for systematic deviations from rationality and there is a growing body of literature exploring the effect of visceral factors as the more dominant drivers. This study builds on the existing literature by investigating the impact of anger, sadness, happiness, anxiety, hunger, energy, tiredness and stress on three distinct elements that define risk preference: utility, decision weights and loss aversion. By decomposing the impact of visceral factors on risk preference, I am able to provide evidence supporting the proposition that a portion of the variability in individual choice preferences can be explained by interacting visceral states. My findings suggest that visceral factors have the strongest effect on loss aversion, which is a major factor in how people code and evaluate financial outcomes. Anger, sadness, happiness, anxiety, energy and tiredness each affect five or more of the model parameters, while hunger and stress are significant only in their interaction with other visceral factors. I also provide evidence to show that the generalized approaches to characterizing visceral factors and risk preference are too broad to be descriptively meaningful. The results of this study show that emotions and other drive states effect the way people process and interpret information, which is crucial in informing decision-makers of the sources and consequences of irrational behaviour. These findings will be of immediate interest to wealth management specialists, public relations advisers as well as to engineers in designing socially intelligent machines capable of interacting more effectively with humans.

Risk Adaptation and Emotion Differentiation: an Experimental Study of Dynamic Decision-Making

Why Can't We Accurately Predict Others' Decisions? Prediction Discrepancy in Risky Decision-Making

Riskier for Me or for Others? the Role of Domain and Probability in Self-Other Differences, in Risky Decision-Making

Event-related Potentials and the Decision Making under Risk and Ambiguity

Differentiating the influence of incidental anger and fear on risk decision-making

Risk Choice and Emotional Experience: a Multi-Level Comparison Between Active and Passive Decision-Making

Differential Effects of Specific Negative Emotions on Individual Risk Preference Behaviors under Social Accidents: an Analysis from the Perspective of Affective Computing Theory

Temporal Patterns of Pleasant and Unpleasant Affect Following Uncertain Decision-making

Emotion-induced loss aversion and striatal-amygdala coupling in low-anxious individuals

Do incidental positive emotions induce more optimistic expectations of decision outcomes? An empirical study from the perspective of event-related potential

The Relative Importance of the Contrast and Assimilation Effects in Decisions Under Risk

Incidental Emotions Influence Risk Preference and Outcome Evaluation

Comparative Study on Risk Decision Making Based on Emotional Experience and Personality Traits

Effects of approach and withdrawal motivation on risk decision making

Your Happy Expressions Encourage Me to Take Risks: ERP Evidence from an Interpersonal Gambling Game

Risk and emotion: measuring the effect of emotions and other visceral factors on decision making under risk

A multinational analysis of how emotions relate to economic decisions regarding time or risk

Affection in risk decision-making

Emotional Experience and Personality Traits Influence Individual and Joint Risk-Based Decision Making

The Role Of Psychological Resilience And Positive Affect In Risky Decision-Making

Toward a Model of Risky Decisions: Synergistic Effect of Affect Intensity and Affective Processing on Risk-Seeking As a Function of Decision Domain