Abstract:Purpose This paper aims to investigate the effects of external sources of finance and ownership type on the value creation of Chinese acquiring firms. Design/methodology/approach The data set consists of domestic-listed mainland Chinese firms engaged in domestic mergers and acquisitions during the period 2004–2012. Standard event study methodology and cross-sectional regression analysis are used to examine the relationship between external finance, ownership type and value creation of the acquiring firms. Findings This paper finds that whereas bank financing is positively related to the firm value of privately-owned enterprises (POEs), bank financing has a negative but insignificant influence on the firm value of state-owned enterprises (SOEs). Moreover, equity financing has a negative and significant effect on the value creation of SOE acquirers, however, this appears not to be the case of POEs. Research limitations/implications The results suggest that the capital markets in China take into consideration the discriminatory and cheap access to bank loans available to SOEs as negative signals to stock markets, which cause capital markets to punish SOEs through price depreciation. Conversely, capital markets reward POEs in respect of Chinese banks’ discrimination against POEs in bank financing. Practical implications The results suggest that the capital markets in China take into account the discriminatory and cheap access to bank loans available to SOEs as negative signals to stock markets, which cause capital markets to punish SOEs through price depreciation. Conversely, capital markets reward POEs in respect of Chinese banks’ discrimination against POEs in bank financing. Originality/value The results of this study show that external sources of finance and ownership type influence acquiring firm value in an environment where the corporate governance system is weak and the banking sector is dominated by state banks. Further reforms in the financial sector, particularly, in the corporate governance system appear warranted.

The Effects of Foreign Strategic Investors on Pricing of Wealth Management Products of Commercial Banks in China: Does Ownership Structure Matter?

The Effect of Ownership Structure on Leverage Decision: New Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms

Foreign Ownership and the Risk Behavior of Chinese Banks: Do Foreign Strategic Investors Matter?

Foreign strategic investors and bank credit risk in China: Disclosure, finance or management effects?

Fleeing from Systemic Risk at Home Through Cross-Border Acquisitions

The Influence of Foreign Strategic Investor on Commercial Banks in China:2002-2007

The Effects of Ownership on Banks' Performance in China

The Effects Of Ownership Structure And Listed Status On Bank Risk In China

Financial Institution Shareholding and Corporate Innovation: Evidence from China

State Ownership, Cross-Border Acquisition, and Risk-Taking: Evidence from China's Banking Industry

External sources of finance and value creation of Chinese mergers and acquisitions: does ownership type matter?

A Risk Analysis of Chinese Banking Industry Introducing Strategic Investors

Do Private Strategic Investors Improve Capital Allocation Efficiency of SOEs? Evidence from China

Diversification strategy and bank market power: does foreign ownership matter?

Research on the Ownership Structure and Market Value of Chinese Listed Commercial Banks

Institutional investors and cost of capital: The moderating effect of ownership structure

Does privatization reform alleviate ownership discrimination? Evidence from the Split-share structure reform in China

Ownership, Institutions, and Capital Structure: Evidence from China

Bank ownership and executive perquisites: New evidence from an emerging market

The Effect of Ownership on the Prudential Behavior of Banks - the Case of China

Does State Ownership Really Matter in Determining Access to Bank Loans? Evidence from China's Partial Privatization