Abstract:Principal component analysis (PCA) is a widely used technique for data analysis and dimension reduction with numerous applications in science and engineering. However, the standard PCA suffers from the fact that the principal components (PCs) are usually linear combinations of all the original variables, and it is thus often difficult to interpret the PCs. To alleviate this drawback, various sparse PCA approaches were proposed in the literature (Cadima and Jolliffe in J Appl Stat 22:203–214, 1995; d’Aspremont et al. in J Mach Learn Res 9:1269–1294, 2008; d’Aspremont et al. SIAM Rev 49:434–448, 2007; Jolliffe in J Appl Stat 22:29–35, 1995; Journée et al. in J Mach Learn Res 11:517–553, 2010; Jolliffe et al. in J Comput Graph Stat 12:531–547, 2003; Moghaddam et al. in Advances in neural information processing systems 18:915–922, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2006; Shen and Huang in J Multivar Anal 99(6):1015–1034, 2008; Zou et al. in J Comput Graph Stat 15(2):265–286, 2006). Despite success in achieving sparsity, some important properties enjoyed by the standard PCA are lost in these methods such as uncorrelation of PCs and orthogonality of loading vectors. Also, the total explained variance that they attempt to maximize can be too optimistic. In this paper we propose a new formulation for sparse PCA, aiming at finding sparse and nearly uncorrelated PCs with orthogonal loading vectors while explaining as much of the total variance as possible. We also develop a novel augmented Lagrangian method for solving a class of nonsmooth constrained optimization problems, which is well suited for our formulation of sparse PCA. We show that it converges to a feasible point, and moreover under some regularity assumptions, it converges to a stationary point. Additionally, we propose two nonmonotone gradient methods for solving the augmented Lagrangian subproblems, and establish their global and local convergence. Finally, we compare our sparse PCA approach with several existing methods on synthetic (Zou et al. in J Comput Graph Stat 15(2):265–286, 2006), Pitprops (Jeffers in Appl Stat 16:225–236, 1967), and gene expression data (Chin et al in Cancer Cell 10:529C–541C, 2006), respectively. The computational results demonstrate that the sparse PCs produced by our approach substantially outperform those by other methods in terms of total explained variance, correlation of PCs, and orthogonality of loading vectors. Moreover, the experiments on random data show that our method is capable of solving large-scale problems within a reasonable amount of time.

Variance Reduced Stochastic Optimization for PCA and PLS.

Robust Principal Component Analysis Based on Maximum Correntropy Criterion

Stochastic Optimization for Kernel Pca

Prescriptive PCA: Dimensionality Reduction for Two-stage Stochastic Optimization

Robust Covariance Estimation for Distributed Principal Component Analysis

Structured Principal Component Analysis Model With Variable Correlation Constraint

Efficient Optimization Algorithms for Robust Principal Component Analysis and Its Variants

Robust PCA via Outlier Pursuit

Avoiding Optimal Mean Robust PCA/2DPCA with Non-Greedy L1-norm Maximization

A Variance Minimization Criterion to Feature Selection Using Laplacian Regularization

Variance constrained partial least squares

Sparse principal component analysis via regularized low rank matrix approximation

Bilinear Factor Matrix Norm Minimization for Robust PCA: Algorithms and Applications

An augmented Lagrangian approach for sparse principal component analysis

Dynamic Principal Subspaces in High Dimensions

Dynamic Principal Subspaces with Sparsity in High Dimensions

Learning Feature Sparse Principal Subspace.

On some limitations of probabilistic models for dimension-reduction: Illustration in the case of probabilistic formulations of partial least squares

Robust Sparse Principal Component Analysis

Near-optimal stochastic approximation for online principal component estimation

L1-2DPCA Revisit Via Optimization on Product Manifolds