ADAPTIVE STRATEGY FOR EXPIRATORY POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE LEVEL IN NON-INVASIVE VENTILATION AFTER EXTUBATION OF COPD PATIENTS WITH OBESITY HYPOVENTILATION SYNDROME: A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMISED, CONTROLLED STUDY
B. Han,S. Zhang,Y. Wang,Y. Song,Z. Wu,J. Jiao,Y. Tian,J. Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2017.07.047
IF: 4.3
2017-01-01
Respiratory Medicine
Abstract:Background: Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is the usual option for extubated COPD patients. Whether automatic-titrating expiratory positive airway pressure (EPAP) after extubation in COPD patients with obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS) is a superior strategy to a fixed EPAP level has rarely been assessed. This study aimed to determine whether patients benefit from NIV in which EPAP was automatically varied. Methods: This prospective, randomised, controlled study was conducted in two teaching hospital medical respiratory intensive care units (RICU) in Beijing and Tianjin (China). Both hospitals obtained approval of the ethics committee and obtained signed consent. All subjects passed spontaneous breathing trial (SBT), had readiness to extubation, no disturbance of consciousness, and no facial deformity. Depending on ventilation mode, participants were randomly assigned into two groups: the auto-EPAP group and the fixed-EPAP group. Parameters in auto-EPAP group were average volume-assured pressure support (AVAPS) automatic-titrating EPAP (AVAPS-AE) mode; maximum EPAP 16 cmH2O and minimum EPAP 6 cmH2O; IPAP was 15–25 cmH2O; tidal volume depending on individual BMI. Parameters in fixed-EPAP group were AVAPS (average volume assured pressure support) mode, with the same parameters above except the fixed level of EPAP (EPAP 10 cmH2O, which equalled that in pre-extubation). Both groups accepted with baseline therapy. Findings: A total of 46 elderly COPD patients (pre-FEV1 45.2±2.6%) with OHS were recruited. The mean±SD age of subjects was 73.4±8.5years, BMI was 32.1±4.6 kg/m2, and 36 (78.3%) of the participants were men. Compared with the fixed-EPAP group, patient comfort was higher in the auto-EPAP group, with a higher VAS score (7.4±2.3 versus 3.3±1.4; p=0.021) and lower incidence of patient-ventilator asynchrony (17.39% versus 65.21%; Χ2 10.85; p=0.001) and abdominal distension (39.13% versus 78.26%; Χ2 7.263; p=0.007). The difference in re-intubation rate within 14 days was not significant (4.3% versus 13.0%; Χ2 1.095; p=0.295). Interpretation: The level of EPAP set in NIV for extubation of COPD patients with OHS should be of a varying range that can be adjusted to changing levels of intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure among individuals, rather than a fixed and strict parameter. AVAPS-AE mode could improve patient-ventilator synchronisation and decrease adverse events post-extubation. The automatic-titrating EPAP may be expected to improve successful likelihood of extubation. Our study lacked relative measures of breathing mechanics and the appropriate range of EPAP could not be defined. Funding: None. Conflicts of interest: We declare that we have no conflicts of interest.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?