Abstract:Motion is a typical reaction among animals and humans trying to reach better conditions in a changing world. This aspect has been studied intensively in social dilemmas where competing players' individual and collective interests are in conflict. Starting from the traditional public goods game model, where players are locally fixed and unconditional cooperators or defectors are present, we introduce two additional strategies through which agents can change their positions of dependence on the local cooperation level. More importantly, these so-called sophisticated players should bear an extra cost to maintain their permanent capacity to evaluate their neighborhood and react accordingly. Hence, four strategies compete, and the most successful one can be imitated by its neighbors. Crucially, the introduction of costly movement has a highly biased consequence on the competing main strategies. In the majority of parameter space, it is harmful to defectors and provides a significantly higher cooperation level when the population is rare. At an intermediate population density, which would be otherwise optimal for a system of immobile players, the presence of mobile actors could be detrimental if the interaction pattern changes slightly, thereby blocking the optimal percolation of information flow. In this parameter space, sophisticated cooperators can also show the co-called Moor effect by first avoiding the harmful vicinity of defectors; they subsequently transform into an immobile cooperator state. Hence, paradoxically, the additional cost of movement could be advantageous to reach a higher general income, especially for a rare population when subgroups would be isolated otherwise.

The Influence of Migration Speed on Cooperation in Spatial Games

Role of Adaptive Migration in Promoting Cooperation in Spatial Games.

Effects of Directional Migration for Pursuit of Profitable Circumstances in Evolutionary Games

Does migration cost influence cooperation among success-driven individuals?

Evolution of Cooperation among Game Players with Non-Uniform Migration Scopes

Migration Based on Environment Comparison Promotes Cooperation in Evolutionary Games

Migration based on historical payoffs promotes cooperation in continuous two-dimensional space

Effect of mixed random and directional migration on cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma

Universal role of migration in the evolution of cooperation

Adaptive long-range migration promotes cooperation under tempting conditions

Promotion of cooperation by payoff-driven migration

Effect of Different Migration Strategies on Evolution of Cooperation in Spatial Prisoner's Dilemma Game

Environment-driven migration enhances cooperation in evolutionary public goods games

The Influence of Environment Based Autonomous Mobility on the Evolution of Cooperation

Moving Away From Nasty Encounters Enhances Cooperation In Ecological Prisoner'S Dilemma Game

Neighbor-considered Migration Facilitates Cooperation in Prisoner's Dilemma Games

Migration costs and rewarding schemes in spatial public goods games

When costly migration helps to improve cooperation

Long-range Mobility and Cooperation Evolution under Condition of Different Information Amounts

Acculturation and the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods games

Evolution Of Cooperation Driven By Reputation-Based Migration