An Evidence-Based Interdisciplinary Protocol for Renal Transplant Recipients with Severe Pneumonia: A 4-Year Accumulated Experience.

G. Tu,R. Rong,M. Ju,M. Xu,D. Zhu,Y. Han,R. Song,H. He,Z. Xue,T. Zhu,Z. Luo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-201407151-02119
2014-01-01
Transplantation
Abstract:Introduction: Treatment of severe pneumonia after renal transplantation frequently requires a comprehensive involvement; however, therapeutic strategies remain diverse and experimental without uniform effectiveness. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a standardized interdisciplinary protocol for severe pneumonia after renal transplantation. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected for 53 renal recipients with severe pneumonia between 2009 and 2012 in a tertiary intensive care unit. The standardized protocol involves fiberoptic bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage, broad-spectrum antibiotics therapy, aggressive immunosuppression withdrawal, intravenous corticosteroid administration, nutrition support, conservative fluid management, and mechanical ventilation support. All the patients were managed by an interdisciplinary team led by intensivists. Results: Thirty-five (66.0%) patients underwent a bronchoalveolar lavage and 24(45.3%) had a definitive etiologic diagnosis. Thirty-three (62.3%) patients received non-invasive ventilation (NIV) as initial respiratory support. Of 20 NIV treated patients with early-onset pneumonia, 12 (60%) were intubated. However, only 2 of 13 (23.1%) patients with late-onset pneumonia failed NIV in this study (P=0.005). The estimated glomerular filtration rate at ICU discharge was 65±14 mL/min, which was close to mean renal function on ICU admission (63±12 mL/min, P=0.138). No acute allograft rejection occurred. ICU mortality was 17.2% (5 of 29) in patients with early-onset pneumonia versus 4.2% (1 of 24) in those with late-onset pneumonia (P=0.946). Conclusions: Early-onset pneumonia in renal transplant recipients resulted in higher rate of NIV failure, longer duration of mechanical ventilation, and increased length of ICU and hospital stay. Our results suggest that the standardized interdisciplinary protocol might be both effective and feasible with minimal risk of graft loss.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?