Abstract:Abstract Background Studies in high-income countries have found that female physicians exhibit better performance than their male counterparts. However, it is largely unclear whether these findings are influenced by case and patient mix bias. We aimed to objectively assess differences in clinical practice and treatment between female and male primary care providers in rural China. Methods In this cross-sectional study, we used standardised patients to assess provider performance in clinical practice, yielding objective performance measures free from case and patient mix bias. We included 309 primary providers who received 412 visits from standardised patients in township health centres in rural areas of three provinces in western, central, and eastern China. All providers were visited by standardised patients who were trained to consistently present three disease cases. Clinical process was graded against checklists based on national and international guidelines of recommended questions and exams to be performed. Assessment of treatment considered the appropriateness of medicine dispensed and referrals made, as well as the types and quantity of medicines dispensed. Unadjusted comparisons of the performance of male and female providers used Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regressions controlling for disease cases. Adjusted comparisons additionally controlled for facility fixed effects and provider characteristics. We obtained ethics approval from the institutional review boards of Stanford University, USA, and Sichuan University, China. Informed consent was obtained verbally from all providers participating in the study. Consent from village and township providers was obtained as part of the facility survey approximately 5 weeks before visits. All individuals who participated as standardised patients were trained to protect themselves from any invasive tests or procedures. Findings In unadjusted comparisons, female providers completed 0·76 (95% CI 0·05–1·47) more clinical checklist items on average than male providers, representing an increase of 15% over the mean number of checklist items completed by male providers (5·04 items). Female providers were also 15 percentage points (95% CI 0–30) more likely to give appropriate treatment than male providers (38%). Although, there was no significant difference in unadjusted comparisons (43% for female providers and 41% male providers), female providers prescribed significantly fewer unnecessary or harmful medicines such as antibiotics than male providers after controlling for facility fixed effects and other provider characteristics (–21 percentage points, 95% CI −41 to −2). Interpretation This study finds that female providers prescribe fewer unnecessary or harmful treatments in primary care than male providers in rural China after controlling for potential sources of bias. No difference between female and male providers was found for other measures of clinical process quality after adjusting for observable characteristics. Funding 111 Project (Grant B16031 ), the Laboratory of Modern Teaching Technology of the Ministry of Education, Shaanxi Normal University, National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 71703083 ), the National Social Science Fund Youth Project (Grant 15CJL005 ), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 71703084 ), and the Knowledge for Change program at The World Bank (Grant 7172469 ).

The Quality of Primary Care and Correlates among Grassroots Providers in Rural China: a Cross-Sectional Standardised Patient Study

Primary care quality and provider disparities in China: a standardized-patient-based study

Process quality, diagnosis quality, and Patient Satisfaction of primary care in Rural Western China: A study using Standardized Patients

Assessing the Quality of Primary Healthcare in Seven Chinese Provinces with Unannounced Standardised Patients: Protocol of a Cross-Sectional Survey

Survey Using Incognito Standardized Patients Shows Poor Quality Care in China's Rural Clinics.

Quality of primary health care for chronic diseases in low-resource settings: Evidence from a comprehensive study in rural China

Quality of primary healthcare for chronic diseases in low-resource settings: evidence from a mixed methods study in rural China

Are Rural Primary Care Providers Able to Competently Manage Common Illnesses? A Cross-Sectional Study in Rural Sichuan, Western China

Using standardized patients to assess the quality of type 2 diabetes care among primary care providers and the health system: Evidence from rural areas of western China

Comparing the Quality of Primary Care Between Public and Private Providers in Urban China: A Standardized Patient Study.

Comparison of Patients' Perceived Quality of Primary Care Between Urban and Rural Community Health Centers in Guangdong, China

Consultation length, process quality and diagnosis quality of primary care in rural China: A cross-sectional standardized patient study

Measurements of Quality of Village-Level Care and Patients’ Healthcare-Seeking Behaviors in Rural China

Comparison of patient perceived primary care quality in public clinics, public hospitals and private clinics in rural China

The quality of primary care in community health centers: comparison among urban, suburban and rural users in Shanghai, China

The Association Between Patient-Centered Communication and Primary Care Quality in Urban China: Evidence from a Standardized Patient Study

Using Standardised Patients to Assess the Quality of Medical Records: an Application and Evidence from Rural China

How does physician gender influence primary care quality? evidence from a standardised patient audit study in China

Revisiting Gender Gap in Quality of Health Care in Urban China: a Standardised Patient Audit Study

Patient Satisfaction and Its Health Provider-Related Determinants in Primary Health Facilities in Rural China

Managing the quality of primary health care in urban China: the impact of organizational and physician features