Influence of Calcineurin Inhibitors Selection on the Outcome of HCV Recurrence in Liver Transplantation Recipients: A Meta-Analysis.

Z. Guo,J. Lin,W. Ju,D. Wang,X. He
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-201407151-02400
2014-01-01
Transplantation
Abstract:Background and Objective A controversy exists over whether the selection of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), namely Tacrolimus (Tac) or Cyclosporine A (CsA), can influence the outcomes of liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, especially the outcome of HCV recurrence. Here, we performed a meta-analysis on the outcomes of HCV infected liver transplant recipients treated with Tac or CsA. Methods We performed an electronic database search as well as a manual search of relevant journals until the end of 2012. The selection criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCT) with Tac and CsA treatment arms in which HCV-infected liver transplant recipients were included in the study population. Two authors identified and extracted data independently. Dichotomous data were expressed as relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results In all, eight RCTs with 734 patients were included in this study. No significant heterogeneity was detected among the pooled data (all P values > 0.1) and a fixed effects model was used to calculate the overall treatment effect size. Statistically significant differences between Tac and CsA groups were not found for the incidences of severe fibrosis (RR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.59-1.62, P = 0.93), fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (RR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.49-1.95, P = 0.95), patient mortality (RR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.49-1.01, P = 0.06) and graft survival (RR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.64-1.23, P = 0.46). Regarding the aspect of rejection, Tac group exhibited a lower incidence of acute rejection than CsA group (RR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.49-0.95, P = 0.02).Figure: No Caption available.Figure: No Caption available.Conclusion: CNIs selection did not influence the outcome of liver transplant recipients with HCV infection. However, Tac can offer advantages over CsA in lowering the incidence of acute rejection.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?