Abstract:Corporate social responsibility (CSR) research is not new, but its importance to today's socially conscious market environment is even more evident in recent years. This study moves beyond CSR as simply the socially responsible actions and policies of organizations and focuses on the complex psychology of CSR as it relates to individuals within the organization. Given CSR can positively affect both the individuals within the organization and the organization itself, better understanding and leveraging the mechanisms and conditions of CSR that facilitate desired employee outcomes is crucial for organizational performance. However, scholars lack consensus in determining a theoretical framework for understanding how and under what conditions CSR will make an impact on employees and ultimately organizational performance. This study adds clarity by exploring the effect of perceived CSR on a more comprehensive set of employees' attitudinal and behavioral reactions (i.e., turnover intention, in-role job performance, and helping behavior) via the mediating mechanism of organizational identification and the moderating condition of moral identity. Hypotheses were derived using social identity theory. Results were based on data obtained from 340 Chinese manufacturing employee-supervisor dyads. This study found that employees' perceived CSR had an indirect relationship via organizational identification with each of the variables: (1) turnover intention, (2) in-role job performance, and (3) helping behavior. Specifically, the negative relationship between perceived CSR and turnover intention was stronger when employees had higher moral identity and the positive relationship between perceived CSR and in-role job performance and helping behavior was amplified by moral identity. Our findings show how the mediating mechanism of organizational identity and the moderating condition of moral identity work together to improve organizational effectiveness. The findings reveal several ways in which organizations can strategically focus their CSR and human resource efforts, such as applying this model and focusing on moral identity as a key indicator when evaluating employees.

Relationship Between Core Self-Evaluations and Team Identification: the Perception of Abusive Supervision and Work Engagement

Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Outcomes: A Moderated Mediation Model of Organizational Identification and Moral Identity.

Influence of Subordinates' and Supervisors' Network Positions on the Effect of Abusive Supervision

Relative Leader-member Exchange and Unethical Pro-leader Behavior: A Cross-level Moderated Mediation

Abusive Supervision Mediates Self-Fulfilling Prophecies: the Moderating Role of Outcome Dependence

Abusive supervision and work behaviors: The mediating role of LMX

Supervisors' upward exchange relationships and subordinate outcomes: testing the multilevel mediation role of empowerment.

A Social Network Approach to Explore the Influences of Abusive Supervision in Teams

Core self-evaluation and work engagement: employee strengths use as a mediator and role overload as a moderator

Linking Ethical Leadership to Employees' Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Testing the Multilevel Mediation Role of Organizational Concern

Corporate Hypocrisy And Counterproductive Work Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model Of Organizational Identification And Perceived Importance Of Csr

Abusive supervision and subordinate performance: Instrumentality considerations in the emergence and consequences of abusive supervision.

Bad bosses and self‐verification: The moderating role of core self‐evaluations with trust in workplace management

Expression of the leucocyte integrin LFA-1 (CD11a/CD18) and its ligand ICAM-1 (CD54) in lymphoid malignancies is related to lineage derivation and stage of differentiation but not to tumor grade.

The Role of Affective Commitment and Future Work Self Salience in the Abusive Supervision–job Performance Relationship

Abusive Supervision And Team Effectiveness: The Mediating Role Of Team Efficacy

Abusive Supervision and Team Performance: Mediating Effects of Team Communication and Efficacy

Who uses abusive supervision to punish deviant employees? An integration of identity threat and self‐regulation perspectives

Can abusive supervision motivate customer-oriented service sabotage? A multilevel research

"Narcissism, Abusive Supervision Climate, and Team Effectiveness: Testing a Mediation Model"