Abstract: Real-time identification of formation lithology is of great significance to optimization of drilling rate and directional drilling. However, the experimental observation method and the statistical analysis method require researchers with rich experience and professional knowledge, and the identification efficiency is low and the cost is high. The goal of this study is to employ machine learning for identifying lithology from only the real-time drilling parameters without any downhole measurements. First, the real-time drilling data were cleaned, and then the correlation between each drilling parameter and formation lithology was analyzed by correlation analysis algorithm, and 13 drilling parameters were selected as model inputs. And then random forest (RF) and XGBoost algorithms are used to develop lithology identification models respectively. The results show that the XGBoost model has the best result in identifying formation lithology, with an accuracy of 79.21%. Finally, feature importance analysis shown that MWI, MWO and MFI have important effects on model performance. This study has important implications for improving the probability of drilling into reservoirs and reducing drilling costs. Lithology identification is an important basic problem in the fields of geology, oil and gas exploitation, resource exploration, geotechnical engineering, etc (Xu et al., 2021). In drilling engineering, accurate and timely determination of the formation lithology at the positive bit is one of the most important factors to ensure safe and efficient drilling (Al-AbdulJabbar et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2017; Shan et al., 2015). The classical lithology identification methods mainly include two kinds, one is the experimental observation method, through the direct observation of rock specimens or rock cast thin slices, the rocks can be classified according to their mineral composition, color, etc (Guojun et al., 2010; Hu et al., 2010). The other is the statistical analysis method, the logging cross-section chart is drawn by measuring the logging response characteristics of pure rocks, and then the rock type is roughly determined according to the actual logging values (Teama et al., 2016; Zhou et al., 2016). The above two traditional lithology identification methods require researchers with rich experience and professional knowledge, and the identification efficiency is low and the cost is high. Therefore, a fast and accurate method for lithology identification is urgently needed.

Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods for Formation Lithology Identification: A Comparison of Tuning Processes and Model Performances

Well-Logging-Based Lithology Classification Using Machine Learning Methods for High-Quality Reservoir Identification: A Case Study of Baikouquan Formation in Mahu Area of Junggar Basin, NW China

A Data-Driven Approach for Lithology Identification Based on Parameter-Optimized Ensemble Learning

Evaluation of Active Learning Algorithms for Formation Lithology Identification

Towards Optimization of Boosting Models for Formation Lithology Identification

Machine Learning Algorithms for Lithofacies Classification of the Gulong Shale from the Songliao Basin, China

Research Status and Prospects of Intelligent Logging Lithology Identification

A Coarse-to-Fine Approach for Intelligent Logging Lithology Identification with Extremely Randomized Trees

Application and Comparison of Machine Learning Methods for Mud Shale Petrographic Identification

A Novel Method for Real-Time Identification of Formation Lithology Based on Machine Learning

A data driven approach to assess the petrophysical parametric sensitivity for lithology identification based on ensemble learning

A Tri-Training method for lithofacies identification under scarce labeled logging data

Lithology identification using well logs: A method by integrating artificial neural networks and sedimentary patterns

Volcanic lithology identification based on parameter-optimized GBDT algorithm: A case study in the Jilin Oilfield, Songliao Basin, NE China

Lithology identification from well-log curves via neural networks with additional geologic constraint

Research on lithology identification method based on mechanical specific energy principle and machine learning theory

Identification of Carbonate Sedimentary Facies from Well Logs with Machine Learning

Applications of Different Classification Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Formation Tops and Lithology While Drilling

Evaluation of machine learning methods for lithology classification using geophysical data

A gradient boosting decision tree algorithm combining synthetic minority oversampling technique for lithology identification

An Improved Method for Lithology Identification Based on a Hidden Markov Model and Random Forests