Effect of Gallium and Vanadium in NiMoV/Al2O3-Ga2O3 Catalysts on Indole Hydrodenitrogenation
Esneyder Puello-Polo,Yelitce P. Reales,Edgar Marquez,Dunieskys G. Larruded,Luis C. Costa Arzuza,Carlos A. T. Toloza
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-020-03438-y
IF: 2.936
2020-11-04
Catalysis Letters
Abstract:The effect of Ga as support modifier and V as second promoter on the NiMoV/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> catalyst varying the synthesis method (SG: sol–gel synthesis vs I: impregnation synthesis) was studied. The catalysts were characterized by elemental analysis, textural properties, XRD, XPS, <sup>27</sup>Al NMR, Raman, EDX elemental mapping and HRTEM. The chemical analyses by XRF showed coincidence between experimental and theoretical values according to stoichiometric values proposed to Mo/Ni = 6 and (V + Ni)/(V + Ni + Mo) = 0.35. The sol–gel synthesis method increased the surface area by incorporation of Ga<sup>3+</sup> ions into the Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> forming Ga–O–Al bonding; whereas the impregnation synthesis leads to decrease by blocking of alumina pores, as follows NiMoV/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>(I) < NiMoV/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>(SG) < Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>(I) < NiMo/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> < Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>(SG) < Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>. The values of BJH mesopores mean size between 6.13 and 7.68 nm. XRD and XPS confirmed a bulk structure typical of (NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>4</sub>[NiMo<sub>6</sub>O<sub>24</sub>H<sub>6</sub>]·5H<sub>2</sub>O and the presence at the surface of Mo<sup>4+</sup>, Mo<sup>6+</sup>, Ni<sub>x</sub>S<sub>y</sub>, NiMoS, Ni<sup>2+</sup>, Ga<sup>3+</sup> and V<sup>5+</sup> species, respectively. Raman showed that the sol–gel synthesis method reduces the interactions Ni-Mo sulfide-support and improvement the sulfidation degree NiMoV/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>(SG) as showed sulfur analysis CHONS. The largest proportion of AlO<sub>4</sub> content using the impregnation method to add Ga was verified by <sup>27</sup>Al solid-state MAS NMR. The EDS elemental mapping confirmed that Ni, Mo, Al, Ga, V and S are well-distributed on support. The HRTEM analysis shows that the length and stacking distribution of MoS<sub>2</sub> crystallites varied from 5.67 to 6.01 nm and 2.46 to 2.74 when using the sol–gel and impregnation synthesis method, respectively. The catalytic results revealed that the synthesis method induced the presence of gallium on the surface influencing the dispersion V<sup>5+</sup> species, whose effect could have some relation with strength and density of acid sites that in turn influence the dispersion of the MoS2 phase, which correlates well with the indole HDN activities. The activities as indole HDN pseudo-first-order rate constants' values (k<sub>HDN</sub>) from 0.29 to 2.78 mol/(m<sup>2</sup>·h): NiMoV/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> < NiMoV/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>(I) < NiMo/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> < NiMoV/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>(SG). Nevertheless, the nature of the active site can be related with reaction pathways, that is, NiMoV/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>(SG) and NiMoV/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>(I) catalysts produce ECH through HIND, while NiMoV/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and NiMo/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> produce EB by hydrogenolysis of HIND to OEA. In the regard, the Ga and V act as structural promoters in the NiMo catalysts, allowing the largest generation of NiMoS M-edge-like and BRIM sites for HDN.
chemistry, physical