Assessment of Abiraterone (abi) Tumor Cell Activity Via in Vitro Models of Androgen (A)-Responsive Prostate Cancer

Ian Hickson,Ann Marien,Maarten Derks,Marc Janssen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.e15166
IF: 45.3
2012-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:e15166 Background: Inhibition of CYP17 by abiraterone acetate (AA) blocks A biosynthesis, reduces A levels and results in inhibition of A-dependent tumor growth. AA has been shown to improve survival in patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (HR = 0.74) (Scher, ASCO 2011). AA is converted to ABI in vivo. This study investigates whether direct effects of ABI on tumor cells (ie, blockade of intratumoral A synthesis) may contribute to the clinical efficacy of AA using in vitro models. Methods: LNCaP cells (human prostate cancer cell line [HPCCL]) were grown in 2D and 3D cultures, and ABI activity was assessed by reduction of androgen receptor (AR) output in gene expression profiling (Affymetrix microarray), reporter assay, and by immunoblot for A-responsive signals. Using ABI-sensitive LNCaP cells, responses were further characterized in the presence or absence of ligand (dihydrotestosterone [DHT]) and with A-targeting agents TOK-001 and MDV3100. Results: ABI exposure resulted in dose-dependent modulation of A-dependent gene expression in Affymetrix microarray analysis of 2D and 3D cultures. Similar results were seen in an analysis of AR-dependent protein and in an AR-driven reporter assay in 2D LNCaP or VCaP (another HPCCL) cell culture. In LNCaP, AR output was inhibited by low concentrations of ABI (IC50 100-300 nM), comparable to TOK-001 (IC50 30-100 nM) and less potent than MDV3100 (IC50 10-30 nM). Growth inhibition (MTT assay) occurred at concentrations 10-fold higher for all compounds. For ABI and TOK-001, inhibition of AR output was reduced by DHT (30- to 100-fold increase in IC50); with MDV3100, the shift in IC50 was less (10-fold) with agonism of AR output at low nM concentrations. Conclusions: ABI has an inhibitory effect on AR output in LNCaP cells. Partially overcoming this inhibition through addition of DHT implies that CYP17 inhibition and the subsequent A reduction play a role in the intratumoral activity of AA. However, persistent inhibition of AR output in the presence of DHT implies additional anti-A effects of AA in prostate tumor cells. This model may provide a useful tool for the study of AR-targeted therapies, combinations of agents, and resistance to agents targeting A.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?