Fusion of Real-Time Us with Ct Images to Guide Selective Lumbosacral Nerve Root Interventional Therapy

Zhiqiang Li,Ligang Cui,Jinrui Wang,Shuiqing Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.08.1624

2017-01-01

Abstract:To investigate the safety and efficacy of fusion of real-time US with CT images guidance selective lumbosacral nerve root interventional therapy. The main purpose of this study was to compare the total puncture time and X-ray fluoroscopy times between two ways to guide nerve root therapy. The study was approved by institutional review board, and written informed consent was obtained from each patient. 60 patients with unilateral lumbar 4, lumbar 5 and sacral 1 radiculopathy were included(mean age, 63.4 years; range, 47-79 years). The patients were divided into two groups of 30 cases and received single-US guidance or US-CT fusion imaging guidance target nerve root puncture respectively. X-ray fluoroscopy was used to adjust the location of the puncture needle and the total puncture time and X-ray fluoroscopy times were both recorded. After X-ray fluoroscopy and electrical stimulation confirming the needle tip around the target nerve root, the pain physician continued the same follow-up treatment for two groups, including the drug injection and pulsed radiofrequency ablation treatment, and the VAS (visual analogue scale) score of 60 patients before and after treatment were recorded overall. All 60 patients were completed puncture and following drug injection and pulsed radiofrequency ablation treatment successfully. Puncture needle reaching the target position verified by X-ray fluoroscopy and induced the corresponding innervation of the sensory and motor response, no obvious complications.In single-US group, the total time of puncture was 9-21 min, the mean (16.9 ± 2.6) min, and the number of X-ray fluoroscopy were 4-8 times, mean (6.0 ± 1.0) times. In fusion Imaging group, the total time of puncture was 13-18min, the mean (15.7 ± 1.3) min; fusion imaging time was 4-8min, mean (6.2 ± 1.0) min; registration error was 2.8-5mm, average (4.0 ± 0.59) mm; the distance between the needle tip last showed by ultrasound and the target was 1.2-2.2cm, average (1.60 ± 0.23) cm; and the number of X-ray fluoroscopy were 3-5 times, mean (3.9 ± 0.8) times. The total time of puncture and the number of X-ray fluoroscopy of the fusion Imaging group were less than that of the single-US group, and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). The VAS score of both two groups before and after treatment has a significant difference (p<0.001), but there was no significant difference between the two groups. Compared with the single-US group, the fusion imaging group can reduce the total time of puncture and the number of X-ray fluoroscopy. The VAS score of both two groups after treatment were significantly lower than those before treatment, confirming the feasibility and effectiveness of fusion imaging technique in the selective lumbosacral nerve root interventional therapy.