Abstract:After many years of research across disciplines, it remains unclear whether people are more motivated to seek appraisals that accurately match self-views (self-verification) or are as favorable as possible (self-enhancement). Within sociology, mixed findings in identity theory have fueled the debate. A problem here is that a commonly employed statistical approach does not take into account the direction of a discrepancy between how we see ourselves and how we think others see us in terms of a given identity, yet doing so is critical for determining which self-motive is at play. We offer a test of three competing models of identity processes, including a new "mixed motivations" model where self-verification and self-enhancement operate simultaneously. We compare the models using the conventional statistical approach versus response surface analysis. The latter method allows us to determine whether identity discrepancies involving over-evaluation are as distressing as those involving under-evaluation. We use nationally representative data and compare results across four different identities and multiple outcomes. The two statistical approaches lead to the same conclusions more often than not and mostly support identity theory and its assumption that people seek self-verification. However, response surface tests reveal patterns that are mistaken as evidence of self-verification by conventional procedures, especially for the spouse identity. We also find that identity discrepancies have different effects on distress and self-conscious emotions (guilt and shame). Our findings have implications not only for research on self and identity across disciplines, but also for many other areas of research that incorporate these concepts and/or use difference scores as explanatory variables.

Maybe I Am Not As Moral As I Thought: Calibrating Moral Identity after Immoral Action

Moral Positive Illusion: Self–other Valuation Difference in Moral Foundation Theory

Moral Perfectionism and Moral Values, Virtues, and Judgments: Further Investigations

Moral Identity as a Moderator of the Effects of Organizational Injustice on Counterproductive Work Behavior among Chinese Public Servants

Money, Moral Transgressions, and Blame

Moral perfectionism and moral values, virtues, and judgments: A preliminary investigation

Situational Moral Evaluations: The Role of Rationalizations & Moral Identity

Implicit Morality Theories: Employees’ Beliefs About the Malleability of Moral Character Shape Their Workplace Behaviors

Daily moral identity: Linkages with integrity and compassion

Principles of Moral Accounting: How our Intuitive Moral Sense Balances Rights and Wrongs

Moral Chameleons: The positive association between materialism and self-interest-triggered moral flexibility

When Moral Tension Begets Cognitive Dissonance: An Investigation of Responses to Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior and the Contingent Effect of Construal Level

A Brief Analysis of the Conception of Moral Identity in Psychology

Who Is Your Biggest Critic? Cultural Variation in Moral Judgments of the Self and Others

Unethical amnesia brain: Memory and metacognitive distortion induced by dishonesty

Improving moral reasoning among college students: a game-based learning approach

Being good to look good: Self‐reported moral character predicts moral double standards among reputation‐seeking individuals

To thine own self be true? Clarifying the effects of identity discrepancies on psychological distress and emotions

Unclearly immoral: Low self-concept clarity increases moral disengagement.

The Authentic Moral Self: Dynamic Interplay Between Perceived Authenticity and Moral Behaviors in the Workplace

Habitual Cognitive Reappraisal Was Negatively Related to Perceived Immorality in the Harm and Fairness Domains