Prospective Assessment of Diagnostic Efficacy and Safety of SonazoidTM and SonoVue® Ultrasound Contrast Agents in Patients with Focal Liver Lesions
Lv Ke,Zhai Hongyan,Jiang Yuxin,Liang Ping,Xu Hui-Xiong,Du Lianfang,Chou Yi-Hong,Xie Xiaoyan,Luo YuKun,Lee Young Joon,Lee Jae Young,Hu Bing,Luo Baoming,Wang Yi,Luan Ying,Kalli Christina,Chen Kun,Wang Wenping,Liang Ja-Der
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03010-1
IF: 2.4
2021-01-01
Abdominal Radiology
Abstract:To assess the respective diagnostic value of Sonazoid™ and SonoVue® for characterizing FLLs as benign or malignant and the corresponding safety. This prospective Phase 3 study was conducted at 17 centres in China and Korea (May 2014 to April 2015); 424 patients (20 to 80 years) with at least 1 untreated focal liver lesion (FLL) (< 10 cm in diameter) underwent a contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examination (218 received Sonazoid of 0.12 μL microbubbles/kg; 206 received SonoVue of 2.4 mL). Three independent blinded readers evaluated pre- and post-contrast images characterising the FLLs as benign or malignant. Sonazoid-enhanced and SonoVue-enhanced ultrasound provided a statistically significant improvement in specificity for all 3 readers comparing to unenhanced ultrasound (for Sonazoid: p = 0.0093, < 0.0001, 0.0011; for SonoVue: p = 0.002, 0.03, 0.12, respectively). Difference in accuracy improvement between the 2 groups was within the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 20% for all 3 readers (6.1%, 95% CI: − 5.0 to 17.2; − 7.5%, 95% CI: − 18.4 to 3.5; − 0.3%, 95% CI: − 11.3 to 10.7). The diagnostic confidence level for all 3 readers increased with post-contrast images relative to pre-contrast images. Both contrast agents were well tolerated. Results showed a similar efficacy for Sonazoid™ and SonoVue® in diagnosing FLLs as benign or malignant, and underlined the benefit of CEUS imaging over unenhanced ultrasound imaging in reaching a confident diagnosis without having to refer patients for additional imaging exams.