Randomized Controlled Phase Iii Study Evaluating The Impact Of Secondary Cytoreductive Surgery In Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: Ago Desktop Iii/Engot Ov20

Andreas du Bois,Ignace Vergote,Gwenael Ferron,Alexander Reuss,Werner Meier,Stefano Greggi,Pernille Tina Jensen,Frédéric Selle,Frédéric Guyon,Christophe Pomel,Fabrice Lecuru,Rongyu Zang,Elisabeth Åvall-Lundqvist,Jae Weon Kim,Jordi Ponce,Francesco Raspagliesi,Sadaf Ghaem-Maghami,Alexander Reinthaller,Philipp Harter,Jalid Sehouli
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.5501
IF: 45.3
2017-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:5501Background: The role of secondary cytoreductive surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer (OC) has not been defined by level-1 evidence. Methods: Pts with OC and 1st relapse after 6+ mos platin-free interval (TFIp) were eligible if they presented with a positive AGO-score (PS ECOG 0, ascites ≤500 ml, and complete resection at initial surgery) and were randomized to 2nd-line chemotherapy alone vs cytoreductive surgery followed by chemo. Chemo regimens were selected according to the institutional standard. We report here results of the predetermined interim analysis. Results: 407pts were randomized 2010-2014. The TFIp exceeded 12 mos in 75% and 76% pts in both arms. 8.9% of 203 pts were operated despite of randomization to the no-surgery arm, whereas 6.9% of 204 pts in the surgery arm did not undergo operation. Complete resection was achieved in 67% of pts; 87% and 88% received a platinum-containing 2nd-line therapy. Median PFS was 14 mos without and 19.6 mos with surgery (HR: 0.66, 95%CI 0.52-0.83, pu003c0.001)....
What problem does this paper attempt to address?