Examining the Effectiveness of the LEAD Dictionary in Presenting and Explaining the Top AVL Words
Kazi Amzad Hossain
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2024.803262s
2024-01-01
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science
Abstract:This study examines the growing importance of proper language usage in academic settings, particularly in English language-based programs, and the shift towards online dictionaries, such as the Louvain English for Academic Purposes Dictionary (LEAD), among learners. The LEAD dictionary is lauded for its focus on addressing challenges faced by non-native English writers, including register variability and phraseological patterns. Concurrently, the Academic Vocabulary List (AVL), developed by Gardner and Davies, underscores the need for representative academic language in dictionaries. The research evaluates the LEAD dictionary’s effectiveness in presenting and exploring the most frequent AVL words, focusing on the top five words: study, group, system, social, and provide. Analysis reveals discrepancies between the presentation of these words in the LEAD dictionary and their frequency and collocations in corpora such as the British National Corpus (BNC) and the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). The COCA’s broader representation of academic disciplines enhances its utility compared to the BNC. Despite being designated as a ‘semi-bilingual dictionary’, the limited coverage of LEAD for mother tongues restricts accessibility for non-native learners. Suggestions for improvement include expanding language coverage, incorporating additional corpora data, enhancing user-friendly features, providing error feedback, and offering diverse learning exercises. Integration into broader teaching and learning tools warrants further exploration. Overall, the study highlights the discrepancy between the LEAD dictionary’s representation of AVL words and their actual usage, signaling areas for enhancement to better serve the needs of language learners and educators.