Non-invasive Preimplantation Genetic Screening of Human Blastocysts

L. Huang,B. Bogale,S. Lu,X. S. Xie,C. Racowsky
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.07.823
IF: 6.7
2017-01-01
Fertility and Sterility
Abstract:Trophectoderm biopsy (TB) and preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) for 24-chromosome aneuploidy using array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and next-generation sequencing (NGS), significantly improves clinical reproductive outcomes. Although TB is a safe procedure if performed by experienced embryologists, development of non-invasive comprehensive chromosome screening, without embryo biopsy, eliminates any risk of embryo damage. The objective of this study was to determine if spent blastocyst culture medium (SBM) and blastocoele fluid (BF), derived from vitrified-warmed blastocysts, could be used for non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening (NIPGS). NIPGS samples (SBM+BF) were analyzed for chromosomal abnormalities and results were compared with the corresponding TB and/or whole blastocyst (WB) samples. Warmed Day 5/6 blastocysts, donated for research, were cultured in separate 25μl droplets (Global HP medium with HSA (LifeGlobal). After24 hours, the blastocysts were collapsed by a laser pulse, and then both SBM and BF samples were collected together as one NIPGS sample into PCR tubes. As a negative control we used the same media without embryo culture. SurePlex kit (BlueGnome) was used for whole genome amplification (WGA) of TB, NIPGS and WB samples. NGS by VeriSeq PGS (Illumina) was used to determine concordance rates for whole chromosome copy number between NIPGS and TB and WB samples. After WGA, the amplification rate of NIPGS samples was 100% (25/25). The concordance rate for whole chromosome copy number between a)NIPGS vs. TB, b)NIPGS vs. WB and c)TB vs. WB samples was 85.0% (17/20); 94.4% (17/18) and 85.7% (12/14) respectively. All NIPGS samples successfully identified the gender of the embryos. Our results showed that whole chromosome (12 samples) and segmental (2 samples) aneuploidies as well as chromosomal mosaicism (2 samples) could be detected in the NIPGS samples using NGS. Genomic DNA from NIPGS samples derived from vitrified-warmed blastocysts can be amplified and used for aneuploidy screening, exhibiting almost full concordance with invasive testing. Additional studies are needed to improve this technology for potential translation into standard clinical genetic testing.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?