Monitoring Proliferation And Neurogenic Differentiation Of Radscs On Graphene-Derivative Substrates

Huixiang Zhong,Dandan Wang,Liuyang Xuan,Shuangshuang Ma,Yihong Gong,Xuetao Shi,Yan Li,Qing Jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/aa87c4
2017-01-01
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Abstract:Graphene and its derivatives, alongwith adipose-derived stemcells (ADSCs), have demonstrated great potential to be used in neuron tissue engineering. ADSCs from rats (rADSCs) were first isolated and the surface markers were evaluated using flow cytometry. TherADSCswerefibroblast-like, positively expressed CD90 andCD105, lacked surface markers CD31, CD34 and CD45, and also showed adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation potentials. Graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) substrates were successfully fabricated. Based on X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy spectra, itwas found thatGOhad more oxygen containing groups than rGO. Onthese substrates, rADSCs were spread; they proliferated very well and no cytotoxicity was observed. For GO, better organized actin in rADSCswas observed than that on rGO, which was probably due to the higher amount of oxygen in GO. After neurogenic induction, it was found that rADSCs transformed from a fibroblast-like to a spindle-likemorphology when observed under a light microscope and scanning electron microscopy, and still no cytotoxic effect was found. Furthermore, immuno fluorescence staining showed that neural- specific markers MAP2 and NeuNwere detected in cells on these substrates. Both GO and rGO substrates were cytocompatible for rADSCs and rGO was probably more prominent in enhancing neurogenic differentiation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?