Abstract:PreviousNext No AccessSEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2009The separation of P‐wave and S‐wave from crosswell seismic data and applicationAuthors: Jiangping LiuXiangzhi ZengJianghai XiaSamba charlesJiangping LiuInstitute of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of GeosciencesSearch for more papers by this author, Xiangzhi ZengInstitute of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of GeosciencesSearch for more papers by this author, Jianghai XiaKansas Geological Survey, The University of KansasSearch for more papers by this author, and Samba charlesInstitute of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of GeosciencesSearch for more papers by this authorhttps://doi.org/10.1190/1.3255093 SectionsAboutPDF/ePub ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Abstract Compared to the surface seismic record and VSP record, the cross‐well seismic records of wave field is more complex. The separation of the P‐wave and S‐wave seismic section is important for interpretation and imaging. This paper discusses a new method that takes into consideration the characteristics of apparent velocity and polarization during both P‐wave and S‐wave propagations. In Approximating the Earth as an elastic body, P‐wave and S‐waves propagate independently through the internal part of the Earth. The wave field recorded at cross‐well geophones is a mixed wave field. Because of low S‐wave velocity, for a given frequency, its wavelength is shorter (which has a higher vertical resolution). In addition, we can get more information in interpretation by integrating both P‐wave and S‐wave than a single‐component. Many works about the separation of P‐ and S‐wave have been carried out. With the development of the seismic exploration, the wavefield separation techniques are getting more advanced. But most tradition P‐wave and S‐wave separation methods are based on the apparent velocity and polarization differences between P‐wave and S‐wave. For example, polarization rotation transform (Li and Cui, 1994) is due to the different polarization orientation between P‐wave and S‐wave; but the transform results are from the different apparent velocity (Trad, 2003). The tradition methods are difficult in ascertaining the polarization angle, which is sensitive to noise. The latest one (Trad, 2003) has a wider application, but there is no use when P‐wave and S‐wave interfere each other (Turner, 1990). At present, the main methods are wave equation methods and polarization separation methods, which both need P‐wave and S‐wave velocity information. From the full wave logging data and acoustic logging data, the velocity measurement is very different from the real velocity. While the polarization direction is very sensitive to the velocity information, the error of velocity measurement from logging data can have a great impact on the separated result. Compared to the traditional method in separating P‐wave from S‐wave, the method discussed in this paper does not use P‐wave and S‐wave velocities so it avoids the influence of the error in velocity measurements from logging data. Thus a more accurate result can be obtained. The processing of model testing and real crosswell data shows the accuracy and effectiveness of this method.Permalink: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3255093FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2009ISSN (print):1052-3812 ISSN (online):1949-4645Copyright: 2009 Pages: 4338 publication data© 2009 Copyright © 2009 Society of Exploration GeophysicistsPublisher:Society of Exploration Geophysicists HistoryPublished Online: 14 Oct 2009 CITATION INFORMATION Jiangping Liu, Xiangzhi Zeng, Jianghai Xia, and Samba charles, (2009), "The separation of P‐wave and S‐wave from crosswell seismic data and application," SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts : 1320-1324. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3255093 Plain-Language Summary PDF DownloadLoading ...

Localized Low-Rank Approximation with Application in Anisotropic Wavefield P-S Decomposition

Domain decomposition: 3D full-anisotropy coupling solver

Multiscale direct-envelope inversion using wavenumber filtering based on reflection tomography for background velocity recovery of large-scale, strong-contrast media

Discontinuous Galerkin Pseudospectral Time Domain Algorithm (DG-PSTD) with Auxiliary Ordinary Differential Equations Perfectly Matched Layer (AODE-PML) for 3D Seismic Modelling

On the method of wave propagation in local angle domain

Seismic source wavefield reconstruction based on proper orthogonal decomposition for finite element modeling

The Separation of P‐wave and S‐wave from Crosswell Seismic Data and Application

VSP Wavefield Separation Method Based on Sparse Representation and SVT

Fast Local Primary-and-multiple Orthogonalization for Surface-Related Multiple Estimation

Improving the S-transform for High-Resolution Reservoir Prediction and Paleochannels Delineation

Deriving a fast P/S decoupled operator from 3D anisotropic Christoffel equation with its application in elastic reverse time migration and angle-domain common-image gathers

3D True-Amplitude Elastic Wave-Vector Decomposition in Heterogeneous Anisotropic Media

Dual-domain Wavefield Reconstruction Method

A fast anisotropic decoupled operator of elastic wave propagation in the space domain for P-/S-wave-mode decomposition and angle calculation, with its application to elastic reverse time migration in a TI medium

Abrupt Feature Extraction Via the Combination of Sparse Representations

Unsplit perfectly matched layer for modeling wave propagation in fluid/porous media

A New Anisotropic Inversion Method Based on the Sparse Representation and Dictionary Learning

Amplitude-preserving P-/S-wavefield Separation with the Discontinuous Galerkin Method on Unstructured Meshes

Delineating Karstification Using Synchrosqueezeing Wavelet Transform

A Symplectic Stereomodelling Algorithm for Elastic Wave Propagation in Porous Media

De-aliased Seismic Data Interpolation Using Seislet Transform with Low-Frequency Constraint