Abstract:Project 211 is one of the most important educational policies in China, which aims at selecting a small number of “key universities” for sustainable development in the 21st century. These selected “key universities” have received substantial funding from the government so they can recruit outstanding faculty and be equipped with high quality facilities. Although this national policy has come into being for more than a decade, limited empirical studies have been conducted to examine how the policy influences students’ performance as well as whether the policy is perceived to interfere with test fairness. Using differential item analysis (DIF) and content analysis, this study examined the effect of group membership (key vs. non-key universities) on one of the large-scale high-stakes language tests–the Graduate School Entrance English Examination (GSEEE). The results identified a number of DIF/DBF, all favoring test takers from key universities. A review of the flagged items by three test reviewers found a myriad of potential factors including unbalanced learning opportunities, which may contribute to performance differences between two groups. However, none of the reviewers deemed that unbalanced educational opportunities brought bias and presented a threat to fairness. Fairness in this context is conceptualized to require individuals or groups who are less well-off to sacrifice social benefits and resources to those who are better off to achieve the overarching aim of maximizing economic benefit to the society.

CLASS TRACKS AND EDUCATION OUTCOMES: EVIDENCE FROM A CHINESE UNIVERSITY

Does Attending A Key School Have A Quality Premium? A Regression Discontinuity Analysis

General and Vocational Tracks and Equity of Higher Education Enrollment Opportunities among Classes: A Reconstruction of Indicator System for Social Class-based Differential Enrollment Opportunities and its Empirical Analysis

Association Between Ability Tracking and Student’s Academic and Non-Academic Outcomes: Empirical Evidence from Junior High Schools in Rural China

The Effect of a National Education Policy on Language Test Performance: a Fairness Perspective

Are Opportunities to Equalize Elite High Schools Discriminatory? Evidence from a Quasi-Experimental Design

Can Greater Reliance on Test Scores Ameliorate the Association Between Family Background and Access to Post-Collegiate Education? Survey Evidence from the Beijing College Students Panel Survey.

Does School Quality Matter?: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Rural China.

How Distinction of Social Stratum Affects the Attainment of Education: an Analysis on Split-flows of Education

Returns to education in China: Evidence from the great higher education expansion

The Effects of Class Attendance on Academic Performance: Evidence from Synchronous Courses During Covid-19 at a Chinese Research University

Can the Elite Stream Improve the Academic Achievement of Senior Secondary School Students? A Study of High School Students from X City in western China based on Regression Discontinuity Analysis

The Impact of Family Background on the Access to Quantity and Quality of Higher Education——from Social Stratification Perspective

The Long-Run Efficiency Consequence of Unfair School Matching: Evidence from China College Student Survey

Access to Elite Education , Wage Premium , and Social Mobility : Evidence from China ’ S College Entrance Exam

How Does Family Background Affect Children’s Educational Achievement? Evidence from Contemporary China

School Quality and Peer Effects: Explaining Differences in Academic Performance Between China’s Migrant and Rural Students

Changes in College Attainment and the Economic Returns to A College Degree in Urban China, 2003-2010: Implications for Social Equality

An Empirical Study on the Impacts of the Undergraduate-Class System on Student Academic Achievement in China

Middle School Tracking and Occupational Status Attainment in China

AbilityvsBackground: an Analysis of the Distribution Mechanism of Higher Education Enrolment Opportunities