Abstract:The Paris Agreement establishes provisions for using international carbon market mechanisms to achieve climate mitigation contributions. Environmental integrity is a key principle for using such mechanisms under the Agreement. This paper systematically identifies and categorizes issues and options to achieve environmental integrity, including how it could be defined, what influences it, and what approaches could mitigate environmental integrity risks. Here, environmental integrity is assumed to be ensured if the engagement in international transfers of carbon market units leads to the same or lower aggregated global emissions. Four factors are identified that influence environmental integrity: the accounting for international transfers; the quality of units generated, i.e. whether the mechanism ensures that the issuance or transfer of units leads to emission reductions in the transferring country; the ambition and scope of the mitigation target of the transferring country; and incentives or disincentives for future mitigation action, such as possible disincentives for transferring countries to define future mitigation targets less ambitiously or more narrowly in order to sell more units. It is recommended that policy-makers combine several approaches to address the significant risks to environmental integrity. Key policy insights Robust accounting is a key prerequisite for ensuring environmental integrity. The diversity of nationally determined contributions is an important challenge, in particular for avoiding double counting and for ensuring that the accounting for international transfers is representative for the mitigation efforts by Parties over time.Unit quality can, in theory, be ensured through appropriate design of carbon market mechanisms; in practice, existing mechanisms face considerable challenges in ensuring unit quality. Unit quality could be promoted through guidance under Paris Agreement Article 6, and reporting and review under Article 13.The ambition and scope of mitigation targets is key for the incentive for transferring countries to ensure unit quality because countries with ambitious and economy-wide targets would have to compensate for any transfer of units that lack quality. Encouraging countries to adopt ambitious and economy-wide NDC targets would therefore facilitate achieving environmental integrity.Restricting transfers in instances of high environmental integrity risk – through eligibility criteria or limits – could complement these approaches. Robust accounting is a key prerequisite for ensuring environmental integrity. The diversity of nationally determined contributions is an important challenge, in particular for avoiding double counting and for ensuring that the accounting for international transfers is representative for the mitigation efforts by Parties over time. Unit quality can, in theory, be ensured through appropriate design of carbon market mechanisms; in practice, existing mechanisms face considerable challenges in ensuring unit quality. Unit quality could be promoted through guidance under Paris Agreement Article 6, and reporting and review under Article 13. The ambition and scope of mitigation targets is key for the incentive for transferring countries to ensure unit quality because countries with ambitious and economy-wide targets would have to compensate for any transfer of units that lack quality. Encouraging countries to adopt ambitious and economy-wide NDC targets would therefore facilitate achieving environmental integrity. Restricting transfers in instances of high environmental integrity risk – through eligibility criteria or limits – could complement these approaches.

Entry into force and then? The Paris agreement and state accountability

The Paris Agreement and the new logic of international climate politics

National ‘fair shares’ in reducing greenhouse gas emissions within the principled framework of international environmental law

Determining the credibility of commitments in international climate policy

Three Models of Global Climate Governance: From Kyoto to Paris and Beyond

Is the Paris Rulebook Sufficient for Effective Implementation of Paris Agreement?

The Process and Impact of Global Climate Governance: A Case Study of the Paris Climate Agreement

Evaluation and performance prospect analysis of Paris Agreement by foreign academic circles

Environmental integrity of international carbon market mechanisms under the Paris Agreement

"We are not droids"– IPCC participants' senses of responsibility and affective experiences across the production, assessment, communication and enactment of climate science

Negotiating the future of the Adaptation Fund: on the politics of defining and defending justice in the post-Paris Agreement period

Exploring Global Climate Policy Futures and Their Representation in Integrated Assessment Models

The Influence of the Paris Agreement on Climate Litigation: Causation, Corporate Governance and Catalyst (Part II)

‘Incantatory’ governance: global climate politics’ performative turn and its wider significance for global politics

20 Years of global climate change governance research: taking stock and moving forward

Litigating climate change through international law: Obligations strategy and rights strategy

Westphalian Sovereignty and the Free-Rider Conundrum in the Atmospheric Commons: Examining Global Governance Regimes for Addressing Climate Change Adaptation

The Paris Agreement: Destined to Succeed or Doomed to Fail?

The international climate finance accounting muddle: is there hope on the horizon?

Taking stock of national climate policies to evaluate implementation of the Paris Agreement