Near 5-Day Nonisostatic Response to Atmospheric Surface Pressure and Coastal-Trapped Waves Observed in the Northern South China Sea

Ruixiang Zhao,Xiao-Hua Zhu,Jae-Hun Park
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-17-0013.1
2017-01-01
Journal of Physical Oceanography
Abstract:Oceanic, nonisostatic responses to near 5-day Rossby-Haurwitz atmospheric pressure waves have been observed in open oceans; however, such responses based on observations in marginal seas such as the South China Sea have not been reported, owing to the limited ocean bottom pressure P-bot records. The P-bot measurements from pressure recording inverted echo sounders (PIESs) at sites in the northern South China Sea revealed a nonisostatic-like response near 5 days, although the coastal-trapped waves (CTWs) appeared to obscure it because their broadband periods include the near 5-day band. Cross-spectral analysis revealed that the PIES P-bot records and the sea level (SL) records of Hong Kong all correlate strongly with the atmospheric pressure and winds over the East China Sea. This is indicative of remotely forced CTWs. The PIES P-bot records showed higher coherence near 5 days with the zonal low-pass wavelength filters applied to the atmospheric pressure, and the phase analysis results strongly suggest nonisostatic oceanic responses to the westward-propagating Rossby-Haurwitz waves. Effective separation of CTWs and the nonisostatic responses from the P-bot records at the near 5-day period was achieved. The oceanic responses to the Rossby-Haurwitz waves in the northern South China Sea were nonisostatic; a 1-mbar change in air pressure resulted in a 1.58-mbar change in P-bot with a phase lag of 14.88 degrees The mean phase speed of CTWs from Hong Kong to station P3 was estimated to be 9.9ms(-1)
What problem does this paper attempt to address?